Citation network
Davis Vs. Portland Seed Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 07, 1924
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Davis v. PortlandSearch
-
Seed Co. - 264 U.S. 403 (1924) U.S. Supreme Court Davis v. PortlandSearch
-
Seed Co., 264 U.S. 403 (1924) Davis v. PortlandSearch
-
exaction recoverable without proof of damage or regard to the intrinsic reasonableness of the rate. Pennsylvania R Co. v. InternationalSearch
-
U. S. 184 . Pp. 264 U. S. 415 , 264 U. S. 424 . 3. The ruling in Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. WolfSearch
-
same direction. It will suffice to state the salient facts and issues disclosed by record No. 114 -- Davis, Agent v. PortlandSearch
-
of actual damage and without regard to the intrinsic reasonableness of either rate. Relying on Pennsylvania R. Co. v. InternationalSearch
-
Nix & Co. v. SouthernSearch
-
S. J. Greenbaum Co. v. SouthernSearch
-
Chattanooga Implement & Mfg. Co. v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Oregon Fruit Co. v. SouthernSearch
-
Illinois Brick Co. v. DirectorSearch
-
Roswell rate being unlawful -- nonexistent indeed -- the Pecos rate became the only one in force. United States v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
order to desist was approved, and the decree of the Commerce Court reversed. No disagreement with Pennsylvania R. Co. v. InternationalSearch
-
without proof of pecuniary loss consequent upon the unlawful act. A similar effort failed in Pennsylvania R. Co. v. InternationalSearch
-
respects highly penal, yet there was no fixed measure of damage in favor of the plaintiff. But, as said in Parsons v. ChicagoSearch
-
Union Pacific R. Co. v. GoodridgeSearch
-
in excess of such lowest rate was extortion, and might be recovered in an action at law as for an overcharge. Denaby v. ManchesterSearch
-
Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-TaenzerSearch
-
Co., 245 U. S. 531 , presents no conflict with Pennsylvania R. Co. v. InternationalSearch
-
or unreasonableness of either. With special knowledge of rate schedules and relying on Pennsylvania R. Co. v. InternationalSearch
-
of the lower rate from Pecos, put in without authorization, might have been forbidden, as pointed out in United States v. LouisvilleSearch
-
After the challenged judgments were entered, Kansas City Southern Ry. v. WolfSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Davis v. PortlandSearch
-
Pennsylvania R Co. v. InternationalSearch
-
Davis, Agent v. PortlandSearch
-
Nix & Co. v. SouthernSearch
-
Parsons v. ChicagoSearch
-
Denaby v. ManchesterSearch
-
Kansas City Southern Ry. v. WolfSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial