Citation network
Chastleton Corp. Vs. Sinclair
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 21, 1924
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 543 (1924) U.S. Supreme Court Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSearch
-
U.S. 543 (1924) Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSearch
-
The Act of October 22, 1919, regulating rents in the District of Columbia, and upheld as an emergency measure in Block v. HirshSearch
-
did not receive them. On motion, the bill was dismissed by the courts below, the Court of Appeals, in view of Block v. HirshSearch
-
at, a bill in equity is the natural and best way of settling the parties' rights. See, e.g., Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSearch
-
U. S. 170 . The original Act of October 22, 1919, c. 80, Tit. II, 41 Stat. 297, considered in Block v. HirshSearch
-
it was continued until May 22, 1924. Act of May 22, 1922, c.197, 42 Stat. 543. We repeat what was stated in Block v. HirshSearch
-
of the law depends upon the truth of what is declared. 256 U.S. 256 U. S. 154 . Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. CourtSearch
-
if the emergency ceases or the facts change, even though Page 264 U. S. 548 valid when passed. Perring v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 232 U. S. 478 , 232 U. S. 486 -487. Missouri v. ChicagoSearch
-
Burlington & Quincy R. Co., 241 U. S. 533 , 241 U. S. 539 -540. In Newton v. ConsolidatedSearch
-
Gas Co., 258 U. S. 165 , a statutory rate that had been sustained for earlier years in Willcox v. ConsolidatedSearch
-
not inquire how far this Court might go in deciding the question for itself, on the principles explained in Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
Coast Line Co., 211 U. S. 210 , 211 U. S. 227 . See Gardner v. BarneySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
South Ottawa v. PerkinsSearch
-
U. S. 260 , Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
Travis v. YaleSearch
-
was pending in the Supreme Court of the District when this suit was begun, and still remains undisposed of. Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
Corporation and Hahn. The doctrine of lis pendens has no application to persons so situated. Terrell v. AllisonSearch
-
Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. LongSearch
-
Steamship Co. v. EmigrationSearch
-
Chicago & Grand Trunk Ry. Co. v. WellmanSearch
-
U. S. 339 , 143 U. S. 345 . Compare Atherton Mills v. JohnstonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSearch
-
Block v. HirshSearch
-
of Block v. HirshSearch
-
Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSearch
-
Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. CourtSearch
-
Perring v. UnitedSearch
-
Missouri v. ChicagoSearch
-
In Newton v. ConsolidatedSearch
-
Willcox v. ConsolidatedSearch
-
Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
See Gardner v. BarneySearch
-
Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Atherton Mills v. JohnstonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial