Citation network
Ex Parte in the Matter of Skinner and Eddy Corp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 12, 1924
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
one. The petitioner offers that and others. Others are that, under the decision of this Court in Sloan Shipyard Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
States Shipping Board Fleet Corporation, 258 U. S. 549 , and United States Shipping Board v. SullivanSearch
-
and, second, that it was doubtful whether, under Russell Motor Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
any stage of the proceedings prior to verdict or judgment, and this right has been declared to be substantial. Barrett v. VirginianSearch
-
United States v. NorfolkSearch
-
It is ordinarily the undisputed right of a plaintiff to dismiss a bill in equity before final hearing. McGowan v. ColumbiaSearch
-
Co., 171 U. S. 138 , 171 U. S. 146 , this statement of the rule in City of Detroit v. DetroitSearch
-
dismiss his bill without prejudice, on payment of costs, was, of course, except in certain cases. Chicago & A. R. Co. v. UnionSearch
-
Cowham v. McNiderSearch
-
Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. HollandSearch
-
Morton Trust Co. v. KeithSearch
-
Pennsylvania Globe Gaslight Co. v. GlobeSearch
-
Youtsey v. HoffmanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
McCabe v. SouthernSearch
-
of this case any such ground for making an exception to the general rule as was shown in Western Union Tel. Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
Bell Tel. Co., 50 F. 662, 664, or in City of Detroit v. DetroitSearch
-
City Railway Co., 55 F. 569, or Manufacturing Co. v. WaringSearch
-
F. 87, or Electrical Co. v. BrushSearch
-
Co., 44 F. 602, or in Bank v. RoseSearch
-
Rich.Eq. (S.C.) 294, or Booth v. LeycesterSearch
-
which, by reason of the Washington suit, intervene and apply. Corona Coal Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
as a legal remedy, in issuing it, a court must be largely controlled by equitable principles. Duncan Townsite Co. v. LaneSearch
-
Sloan Shipyard Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
and United States Shipping Board v. SullivanSearch
-
Russell Motor Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Barrett v. VirginianSearch
-
McGowan v. ColumbiaSearch
-
In Pullman's Car Co. v. TransportationSearch
-
City of Detroit v. DetroitSearch
-
Chicago & A. R. Co. v. UnionSearch
-
Western Union Tel. Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
Manufacturing Co. v. WaringSearch
-
Electrical Co. v. BrushSearch
-
Bank v. RoseSearch
-
Booth v. LeycesterSearch
-
Corona Coal Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Arant v. LaneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial