Citation network
Pacific Tel. and Tel. Co. Vs. Kuykendall
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 26, 1924
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. KuykendallSearch
-
U.S. 196 (1924) U.S. Supreme Court Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. KuykendallSearch
-
U.S. 196 (1924) Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company v. KuykendallSearch
-
legislative, since they can pass upon the weight of evidence, and can set aside a valuation and make a new one. Keller v. PotomacSearch
-
seeking such relief in a federal court before the legislative remedy in the state courts has been exhausted. Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
validity, and is not required to establish that the state statute is not invalid under the state constitution. Dawson v. KentuckySearch
-
required. The conditions set out in the bill therefore seem to have made a case ripe for federal relief. Bacon v. RutlandSearch
-
Prendergast v. N.YSearch
-
the valuation tribunal, pass on the weight of the evidence, and can set aside a valuation and make a new one. Keller v. PotomacSearch
-
final confirmation of the valuation by the state supreme court. The district court relied on the case of Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
reason either of comity or right which should delay the remedy by a bill in a federal court. Territory ex rel. Kelly v. StewartSearch
-
Seattle v. PublicSearch
-
a federal court of equity from suspending the daily confiscation if it finds the case to justify it. Oklahoma Gas Co. v. RussellSearch
-
U. S. 290 , 261 U. S. 293 . In such a case, the Prentis case has no application. Love v. AtchisonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
if it had been, there certainly has been no stay of proceedings in the state court as provided in that section. Dawson v. KentuckySearch
-
should be dismissed. A motion was made for this purpose. We think that, under Page 265 U. S. 206 Shaffer v. CarterSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. KuykendallSearch
-
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company v. KuykendallSearch
-
Keller v. PotomacSearch
-
Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
Dawson v. KentuckySearch
-
Bacon v. RutlandSearch
-
of Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
Kelly v. StewartSearch
-
Seattle v. PublicSearch
-
Oklahoma Gas Co. v. RussellSearch
-
Love v. AtchisonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial