Citation network
United Leather Workers Vs. Herkert
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 09, 1924
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 457 (1924) U.S. Supreme Court United Leather Workers v. HerkertSearch
-
U.S. 457 (1924) United Leather Workers International Union, Local Lodge or Union No. 66 v. HerkertSearch
-
from the factory to their destination in other states or with their sale in those states. United Mine Workers v. CoronadoSearch
-
We think that this question was already been answered in the negative by this Court. In United Mine Workers v. CoronadoSearch
-
Coal mining is not interstate commerce, and the power of Congress does not extend to its regulation as such. In Hammer v. DagenhartSearch
-
shipped or used in interstate commerce make their production a part thereof. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. Co. v. YurkonisSearch
-
The same rule was followed in Gable v. TonnegutSearch
-
Machinery Co., 274 F. 66, 73-74. The same general principles are affirmed in Heisler v. ThomasSearch
-
Crescent Oil Co. v. MississippiSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
McCluskey v. MarysvilleSearch
-
Diamond Glue Co. v. U.SSearch
-
U. S. 528 . The circuit court of appeals seems first to have based its conclusion on cases like Rearick v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
U. S. 507 , Caldwell v. NorthSearch
-
Carolina, 187 U. S. 622 , Brennan v. TitusvilleSearch
-
U. S. 289 , and Robbins v. ShelbySearch
-
The circuit court of appeals found further justification for its conclusion in cases like Eureka Pipe Line Co. v. HallananSearch
-
U. S. 265 , United Gas Co. v. HallananSearch
-
U. S. 277 , Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSearch
-
U. S. 282 , and Lemke v. Farmers'Search
-
Co., 258 U. S. 50 . They present the practical conception of interstate commerce elaborated in Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
even though the milling company might have stopped the grain in Kentucky contrary to the usual course. In Lemke v. Farmers'Search
-
directly burdensome and restraining. Then the circuit court of appeals found sustaining precedent in Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
probably effective intent of the conspirators directed against interstate commerce. The case of Addyston Pipe Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
competition in interstate trade brought them within the federal Anti-Trust Act. So, in the case of Montague & Co. v. LowrySearch
-
prices, was held to constitute a conspiracy in restraint of interstate commerce. On the other hand, Hopkins v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 171 U. S. 578 , Anderson v. UnitedSearch
-
near the line. See also the distinction pointed out by the circuit court of appeals in Pennsylvania Sugar R. Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
element was lacking in the Coronado case. In Loewe v.Lawlor, 208 U. S. 274 , and in Duplex Co. v. DeeringSearch
-
of their palpable intent to achieve their purpose by direct obstruction of that commerce. The cases of Stafford v. WallaceSearch
-
U. S. 495 , and Chicago Board of Trade v. OlsenSearch
-
supervision of such course of business in order to prevent the abuses having such effect. As said in Stafford v. WallaceSearch
-
In United States v. PattenSearch
-
The difference between the Patten case and that of Ware & Leland v. MobileSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United Leather Workers v. HerkertSearch
-
United Mine Workers v. CoronadoSearch
-
Court. In United Mine Workers v. CoronadoSearch
-
In Hammer v. DagenhartSearch
-
Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. Co. v. YurkonisSearch
-
Gable v. TonnegutSearch
-
Heisler v. ThomasSearch
-
Rearick v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Caldwell v. NorthSearch
-
and Robbins v. ShelbySearch
-
United Gas Co. v. HallananSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial