Citation network
Southern Ry. Co. Vs. Watts
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 02, 1923
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 519 (1923) U.S. Supreme Court Southern Ry. Co. v. WattsSearch
-
U.S. 519 (1923) Southern Railway Company v. WattsSearch
-
Page 260 U. S. 520 or the true value and uniformity provisions of the constitution of North Carolina, Arts. V andSearch
-
in a single suit. We must therefore determine state, as well as federal, questions. Michigan Central Railroad Co. v. PowersSearch
-
Greene v. LouisvilleSearch
-
in the machinery for assessment or equalization do not constitute a denial of equal protection of the laws. New York v. BarkerSearch
-
may be unlawfully discriminated against by undervaluation of property of the same class belonging to others. Raymond v. ChicagoSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
This may be true, although the discrimination is practiced through the action of different officials. Greene v. LouisvilleSearch
-
intentional and systematic, unequal assessment will not be held to violate the equality clause. Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. WakefieldSearch
-
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. Co. v. BabcockSearch
-
Courter v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Sioux City Bridge Co. v. DakotaSearch
-
errors of judgment are not subject to review in these proceedings. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. BackusSearch
-
Brooklyn City R. Co. v. StateSearch
-
U. S. 48 , 199 U. S. 52 . There was no taxation of interstate commerce. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. AdamsSearch
-
U. S. 1 . There is not shown any taxation of property without the state, as in Wallace v. HinesSearch
-
had been exhausted, there was no right to seek relief by these bills in equity, See Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. SalmSearch
-
Article v. BeforeSearch
-
a privilege tax is not converted into a property tax because it is measured by the value of property ( compare Clark v. TitusvilleSearch
-
commerce clause. The tax appears to be upon the privilege of doing an intrastate business. Compare Armour Packing Co. v. LacySearch
-
It is not of the character which is held a burden upon interstate commerce. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. ArkansasSearch
-
St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. MiddlekampSearch
-
the tax is not made a condition precedent to granting a railroad permission to do interstate business. Compare Leloup v. MobileSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Southern Ry. Co. v. WattsSearch
-
Southern Railway Company v. WattsSearch
-
of North Carolina, Arts. v. andSearch
-
Michigan Central Railroad Co. v. PowersSearch
-
Raymond v. ChicagoSearch
-
Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. BackusSearch
-
See Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. SalmSearch
-
Article v. BeforeSearch
-
Clark v. TitusvilleSearch
-
Compare Armour Packing Co. v. LacySearch
-
Compare Leloup v. MobileSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial