Citation network
Oklahoma Vs. Texas
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 15, 1923
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 606 (1923) U.S. Supreme Court Oklahoma v. TexasSearch
-
U.S. 606 (1923) Oklahoma v. TexasSearch
-
rivers, including the Red River, which changes rapidly and materially in flood. P. 260 U. S. 636 . Nebraska v. IowaSearch
-
of in an opinion delivered April 11, 1921, wherein this Court recognized that, in the earlier case of United States v. TexasSearch
-
United States v. TexasSearch
-
as the boundary between them. A controversy over that boundary was brought before this Court in Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
mark, and as to the second that the conveyance limited the grant to the bank, and excluded the flats below. Thomas v. HatchSearch
-
Fed.Cas. No. 13,899. A controversy over the boundary between Georgia and Alabama was before this Court in Howard v. IngersollSearch
-
distinguished the case from that of Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
this time covering the full length of the boundary, were presented to this Court by the two states. Alabama v. GeorgiaSearch
-
permitted use, but they afford no basis for regarding the boundary as below the bank or within the river bed. Dunlap v. StetsonSearch
-
Mason, 349, 366. This part of the treaty provision is quite unlike the old compact considered in Maryland v. WestSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the shore of the Potomac, and so carried the jurisdiction and title to the water's edge. See Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
Arkansas v. TennesseeSearch
-
habit of this river is so like that of the Missouri in this regard that the ruling relating to the latter in Nebraska v. IowaSearch
-
the river bank as a boundary. In those of 1856, and possibly others, it was the controlling call. See Schnackenberg v. StateSearch
-
Cordell Petroleum Co. v. MichnaSearch
-
U. S. 258 , 133 U. S. 271 . Under United States v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 1 , and Oklahoma v. TexasSearch
-
Without it, grave disputes might arise as to the true line where islands lie south of the main stream. See Georgia v. SouthSearch
-
Chief Justice Marshall in Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
Note that this cause was decided before ratification of the treaty in 1821. The point for decision in Howard v. IngersollSearch
-
anciently the practice of nations, substantiated by an adherence to it down to our own times. In Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
The well established rule, approved and attempted to be applied in Howard v. IngersollSearch
-
declared to be generally inapplicable to compacts of settlement between independent nations. In Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Oklahoma v. TexasSearch
-
of United States v. TexasSearch
-
Thomas v. HatchSearch
-
of Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
Alabama v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Dunlap v. StetsonSearch
-
Maryland v. WestSearch
-
See Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
See Schnackenberg v. StateSearch
-
Under United States v. TexasSearch
-
and Oklahoma v. TexasSearch
-
See Georgia v. SouthSearch
-
In Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
Nebraska v. IowaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial