Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

The New England Divisions Case

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 19, 1923

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

58 entries 58 unlinked
Show
  1. on its face, may, of course, be set aside if made to accomplish a purpose not authorized. Compare Southern Pacific Co. v. Interstate
    Search
  2. Act 1920, introduced into the federal legislation a new railroad policy. Railroad Commission of Wisconsin v. Chicago
    Search
  3. may, consistently with the due process clause, create rebuttable presumptions. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City R. Co. v. Turnipseed
    Search
  4. Lindsley v. Natural
    Search
  5. Carbonic Gas. Co., 220 U. S. 61 , and shift the burden of proof, Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Railroad
    Search
  6. the divisions. For only in that way could the task be performed. As pointed out in Railroad Commission of Wisconsin v. Chicago
    Search
  7. order of the Commission fixing rates, if unsupported by evidence, is clearly invalid. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union
    Search
  8. Pacific R. Co., 222 U. S. 541 , 222 U. S. 547 . Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. United
    Search
  9. the weight of the evidence or the wisdom of the order entered is beyond our province. Manufacturers' Railway Co. v. United
    Search
  10. Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United
    Search
  11. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. United
    Search
  12. The docket title of this case is Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railway Co. v. United
    Search
  13. Compare St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. United
    Search
  14. Central R. Co. of New Jersey v. United
    Search
  15. are the establishment of the Railroad Labor and the Adjustment Boards. Title III, pp. 469-474. See Pennsylvania R. Co. v. United
    Search
  16. provisions for securing adequate car service, Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore
    Search
  17. Texas v. Eastern
    Search
  18. to prevent the depletion of interstate revenues by discriminating intrastate rates, Railroad Commission of Wisconsin v. Chicago
    Search
  19. New York v. United
    Search
  20. Citing Star Grain & Lumber Co. v. Atchison
    Search
  21. Western Pacific Co. v. Southern
    Search
  22. Pacific Co., 55 I.C.C. 71, 84. See Low Moor Iron Co. v. Chesapeake
    Search
  23. O'Keefe, Receiver v. United
    Search
  24. Manufacturers' Railway Co. v. United
    Search
  25. Louisiana & Pine Bluff Railway Co. v. United
    Search
  26. Congress doubtless had in mind expression to the contrary in opinions of the Commission. See Germain Co. v. New
    Search
  27. Board of Trade of Chicago v. Atlantic
    Search
  28. Compare Burnham, Hanna, Munger Co. v. Chicago
    Search
  29. City of Spokane v. Northern
    Search
  30. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Atchison
    Search
  31. I.C.C. 312. Compare Houston & Texas Ry. Co. v. United
    Search
  32. Eastern Texas R. Co. v. Railroad
    Search
  33. Looney v. Eastern
    Search
  34. also Illinois Central R. Co. v. Public
    Search
  35. Utilities Commission, 245 U. S. 493 , with Business Men's League of St. Louis v. Atchison
    Search
  36. introduce all their division sheets. To a proceeding of this character, the rule acted on in Florida East Coast Line v. United
    Search
  37. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Ry. Co. v. Pittsburgh
    Search
  38. East Jersey R. Co. & Terminal Co. v. Central
    Search
  39. Pacific Fruit Exchange v. Southern
    Search
  40. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Louisville
    Search
  41. O'Keefe v. United
    Search
  42. Manufacturers' Ry. Co. v. United
    Search
  43. Compare Southern Pacific Co. v. Interstate
    Search
  44. Railroad Commission of Wisconsin v. Chicago
    Search
  45. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City R. Co. v. Turnipseed
    Search
  46. Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Railroad
    Search
  47. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union
    Search
  48. Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. United
    Search
  49. Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railway Co. v. United
    Search
  50. See Pennsylvania R. Co. v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial