Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Gorham Mfg. Co. Vs. Wendell

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 19, 1923

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 3 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. Marshall Vs. Dye US Supreme Court · Dec 01, 1913
  2. Murphy Vs. Utter US Supreme Court · May 19, 1902
  3. Long Sault Development Co. Vs. Call US Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1916
  4. U.S. 1 (1923) U.S. Supreme Court Gorham Mfg. Co. v. Wendell
    Search
  5. U.S. 1 (1923) Gorham Manufacturing Company v. Wendell
    Search
  6. was issued against appellant to show cause why the case as to the Comptroller should not be dismissed in view of Irwin v. Wright
    Search
  7. U. S. 219 , and United States v. Butterworth
    Search
  8. Stat. 803. The question raised by the rule was considered by this Court in Irwin v. Wright
    Search
  9. for continuing it against his his successor, abates upon his death or retirement from office. In United States v. Butterworth
    Search
  10. But the statute is not an enabling act in the case of state officers. Reference is made to Long Sault Development Co. v. Call
    Search
  11. in this Court on the point, for it passed here without notice. The same may be said of Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Roberts
    Search
  12. U. S. 318 , also cited. There is a plain intimation Page 261 U. S. 4 in Irwin v. Wright
    Search
  13. color of their offices, alleged to be unauthorized of unconstitutional. This intimation is confirmed in City of Boston v. Jackson
    Search
  14. or death of members would not effect the abatement of the suit and successors could be substituted as parties. Irwin v. Wright
    Search
  15. Richardson v. MaChesney
    Search
  16. the right conclusion by accepting the declaration of the court of appeals of New York in People ex rel. Broderick v. Morton
    Search
  17. from this and from the substitution, already referred to, made by the Supreme Court of New York in Long Sault Co. v. Call
    Search
  18. law, and, as already said, this enables us to avail ourselves in such a case as this of that practice. City of Boston v. Jackson
    Search
  19. U.S. Supreme Court Gorham Mfg. Co. v. Wendell
    Search
  20. Gorham Manufacturing Company v. Wendell
    Search
  21. of Irwin v. Wright
    Search
  22. and United States v. Butterworth
    Search
  23. Irwin v. Wright
    Search
  24. In United States v. Butterworth
    Search
  25. of Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Roberts
    Search
  26. City of Boston v. Jackson
    Search
  27. Broderick v. Morton
    Search
  28. Long Sault Co. v. Call
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial