Citation network
Adkins Vs. Children's Hosp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 09, 1923
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Distinguished
-
Adkins v. Children'sSearch
-
Hosp. - 261 U.S. 525 (1923) U.S. Supreme Court Adkins v. Children'sSearch
-
Hosp., 261 U.S. 525 (1923) Adkins v. Children'sSearch
-
admit of doubt, and this the appellants virtually conceded by having themselves invoked the jurisdiction. See Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
protected by this clause, is settled by the decisions of this Court and is no longer open to question. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
New York Life Insurance Co. v. DodgeSearch
-
Adair v. UnitedSearch
-
Lochner v. NewSearch
-
Butchers' Union Co. v. CrescentSearch
-
an equal right to obtain from each other the best terms they can as the result of private bargaining. In Adair v. UnitedSearch
-
In Coppage v. KansasSearch
-
be exacted by businesses impressed with a public interest. There are many cases, but it is sufficient to cite Munn v. IllinoisSearch
-
their incidental and injurious or destructive effect upon preexisting contracts. See Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. MottleySearch
-
be laid aside as inapplicable. (2) Statutes relating to contracts for the performance of public work. Atkin v. KansasSearch
-
Ellis v. UnitedSearch
-
Statutes prescribing the character, methods and time for payment of wages. Under this head may be included McLean v. ArkansasSearch
-
Erie R.R. Co. v. WilliamsSearch
-
has thus far been brought to the attention of this Court which by its terms, applied to all occupations. In Holden v. HardySearch
-
courts. That this constituted the basis of the decision is emphasized by the subsequent decision in Lochner v. NewSearch
-
which restricted the employment of all persons in bakeries to ten hours in anyone day. The Court referred to Holden v. HardySearch
-
been distinguished from that decision, but the principles therein stated have never been disapproved. In Bunting v. OregonSearch
-
wages, but that contention was rejected and the law sustained as a reasonable regulation of hours of service. Wilson v. NewSearch
-
are forbidden to agree. Page 261 U. S. 552 The same principle was applied in the Rent Cases ( Block v. HirshSearch
-
U. S. 135 , and Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSearch
-
citing Wilson v. NewSearch
-
In a subsequent case, Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSearch
-
Miller v. WilsonSearch
-
As to that, one would think, the line had been pricked out so that it has become a well formulated rule. In Holden v. HardySearch
-
it was applied to miners and rested on the unfavorable environment of employment in mining and smelting. In Lochner v. NewSearch
-
the liberty of contract secured by the Fourteenth Amendment. Then followed a number of cases, beginning with Muller v. OregonSearch
-
limit on maximum hours of labor for women, to which I shall hereafter allude, and, following these cases, came Bunting v. OregonSearch
-
Court which have sustained legislative limitations in respect to the wage term in contracts of employment. In McLean v. ArkansasSearch
-
to make it unlawful to estimate the graduated .pay of miners by weight after screening the coal. In Knoxville Iron Co. v. HarbisonSearch
-
U. S. 13 , it was held that store orders issued for wages must be redeemable in cash. In Patterson v. BarkSearch
-
U. S. 169 , a law forbidding the payment of wages in advance was held valid. A like case is Strathearn S.S. Co. v. DillonSearch
-
of contract in his own interest because of his proneness to squander his wages in port before sailing. In Bunting v. OregonSearch
-
and morals of workers, as for the view that long hours injure their health, then I respectfully submit that Muller v. OregonSearch
-
of women, with power in the board to make certain exceptions. Mr. Justice Brewer, who spoke for the Court in Muller v. OregonSearch
-
her health, and we have had since a series of cases which may be said to have established a rule of decision. Riley v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Page 261 U. S. 567 I am not sure from a reading of the opinion whether the Court thinks the authority of Muller v. OregonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial