Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Merriam

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 12, 1923

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 2 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Gould Vs. Gould US Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1917
  2. Eidman Vs. Martinez US Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1902
  3. U.S. 179 (1923) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Merriam
    Search
  4. U.S. 179 (1923) United States v. Merriam
    Search
  5. against defendants. Upon writs of error from the circuit court of appeals, these judgments were reversed. Merriam v. United
    Search
  6. as a gift of personal property by will, but it is not necessarily confined to a gratuity. Thus, it was held in Orton v. Orton
    Search
  7. Morris v. Kent
    Search
  8. performance of the condition if the executor prove the will or unequivocally manifests an intention to act. Lewis v. Mathews
    Search
  9. Kirkland v. Narramore
    Search
  10. Harrison v. Rowley
    Search
  11. Vesey 212, 215. In Morris v. Kent
    Search
  12. Again, in Richardson v. Richardson
    Search
  13. performance of the service, and the amount fixed is in no sense a legacy, but is purely compensative. In Renshaw v. Williams
    Search
  14. though part of it passed through his hands as administrator pendente lite and part as executor. In Connolly v. Leonard
    Search
  15. the judicially settled meaning which we have stated, we must presume it was used in that sense by Congress. Kepner v. United
    Search
  16. used. If the words are doubtful, the doubt must be resolved against the government and in favor of the taxpayer. Gould v. Gould
    Search
  17. U. S. 151 , 245 U. S. 153 . The rule is stated by Lord Cairns in Partington v. Attorney
    Search
  18. Eidman v. Martinez
    Search
  19. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Merriam
    Search
  20. Merriam v. United
    Search
  21. Orton v. Orton
    Search
  22. Lewis v. Mathews
    Search
  23. In Morris v. Kent
    Search
  24. Richardson v. Richardson
    Search
  25. In Renshaw v. Williams
    Search
  26. In Connolly v. Leonard
    Search
  27. Congress. Kepner v. United
    Search
  28. Partington v. Attorney
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial