Citation network
Lemke Vs. Farmers GraIn Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 27, 1922
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Lemke v. FarmersSearch
-
Grain Co. - 258 U.S. 50 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court Lemke v. FarmersSearch
-
Grain Co., 258 U.S. 50 (1922) Lemke v. FarmersSearch
-
the buying of the grain in North Dakota, was interstate commerce. P. 258 U. S. 54 . Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSearch
-
in the guise of police regulations to protect the welfare of her people. P. 258 U. S. 58 . Merchants Exchange v. MissouriSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to this Court is the only method of review. Section 238 Judicial Code. Page 258 U. S. 53 Carolina Glass Co. v. SouthSearch
-
not dependent solely upon the application and construction of the federal Constitution. Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClainSearch
-
City of Pomona v. SunsetSearch
-
of such commerce in a case closely analogous in its facts, and altogether so in principle, Dahnke Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSearch
-
That was the course of business, and fixed and determined the interstate character of the transactions. Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 265 , and United Fuel Gas Co. v. HallananSearch
-
It seizes upon the grain and controls its purchase at the beginning of interstate commerce. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. ClarkSearch
-
Robbins v. ShelbySearch
-
Philadelphia & Mail S.S. Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Leloup v. MobileSearch
-
Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. TexasSearch
-
Meyer v. WellsSearch
-
feature of the law for the purpose of saving the constitutionality of parts of it. International Text-Book Co. v. PiggSearch
-
and cases cited. Nor is the appellants' contention upheld by the decision of this Court in Merchants' Exchange v. MissouriSearch
-
doubt that the state has power as broad to protect the seller, and, to that end, to license the buyer. Compare House v. MayesSearch
-
that it shall be paid for separately or be returned does not differ in principle from the requirement upheld in McLean v. ArkansasSearch
-
U. S. 539 , that coal shall be measured before screening, or the requirement upheld in Knoxville Iron Co. v. HarbisonSearch
-
U. S. 13 , that store orders shall be redeemed in cash, or that upheld in House v. MayesSearch
-
of the operation of the federal and the state laws given below in the opinion of Judge Amidon. Compare Savage v. JonesSearch
-
Merchants Exchange v. MissouriSearch
-
U. S. 129 , and New York Central R. Co. v. WinfieldSearch
-
But the objection, if sound, would not afford this plaintiff ground for attacking the validity of the statute. Lee v. NewSearch
-
the state, and is carrying on business there under the laws of the state as a public warehouseman. Compare Brass v. StoeserSearch
-
issued by the state Inspector is obnoxious to the commerce clause. If so, a licensee may disregard it. Cargill Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
and it could be eliminated without affecting the operation of any other feature of the state system. Compare Presser v. IllinoisSearch
-
Bowman v. ContinentalSearch
-
of the United States Grain Standards Act (p. 490). Merchants' Exchange v. MissouriSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lemke v. FarmersSearch
-
Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSearch
-
Carolina Glass Co. v. SouthSearch
-
Constitution. Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClainSearch
-
Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
and United Fuel Gas Co. v. HallananSearch
-
Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. ClarkSearch
-
International Text-Book Co. v. PiggSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial