Citation network
Texas Co. Vs. Brown
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 17, 1922
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 466 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court Texas Co. v. BrownSearch
-
U.S. 466 (1922) Texas Company v. BrownSearch
-
goods of that kind are not produced locally, but are all imported from other states. P. 258 U. S. 476 . Askren v. ContinentalSearch
-
of the United States. Upon the merits, questions of state law were and are raised, as they may be ( Greene v. LouisvilleSearch
-
out of interstate commerce, although restrained with respect to products while in such commerce, citing Ratterman v. WesternSearch
-
of practical separability in administration, applied by this Court to a taxing law single on its face in Ratterman v. WesternSearch
-
Union Tel. Co., 127 U. S. 411 , a case followed, since the decision below, in Bowman v. ContinentalSearch
-
since the case involves only relief by injunction, and this operates wholly in futuro. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSearch
-
commerce from state to state (there being no legislation by Congress upon the subject), is well settled. Pure Oil Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
and hence invalid because inconsistent with the exclusive authority of Congress over that subject. Standard Oil Co. v. GravesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of in domestic trade, in view of the fact that all of it has come from other states. But American Steel & Wire Co. v. SpeedSearch
-
Page 258 U. S. 476 in original packages. This decision is in line with the previous cases of Woodruff v. ParhamSearch
-
Wall. 123, 75 U. S. 140 , and Brown v. HoustonSearch
-
U. S. 622 , 114 U. S. 632 -634, and it was pointed out that their authority was not overruled by Leisy v. HardinSearch
-
U. S. 100 , or other cases of like character. Appellant insists that Standard Oil Co. v. GravesSearch
-
App. 249 U. S. 394 -395), and so it was interpreted in Askren v. ContinentalSearch
-
Oil Co., 252 U. S. 444 , 252 U. S. 449 . Brown v. HoustonSearch
-
and American Steel & Wire Co. v. SpeedSearch
-
domestic sales made of personal property similarly freed from interstate commerce, as is illustrated in Woodruff v. ParhamSearch
-
Wagner v. CitySearch
-
of itself sufficient to show a discrimination against interstate commerce. The precise point was dealt with in Askren v. ContinentalSearch
-
The ruling was reiterated in the same case at its final state, Bowman v. ContinentalSearch
-
involving liability for fees, while the products yet remain in the tank cars. A like question raised in Pure Oil Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
but the practical operation and effect of the statutory provisions, which is the proper method ( St. Louis S.W. Ry. v. ArkansasSearch
-
regulation with revenue raising is not a valid objection from the standpoint of the Fourteenth Amendment. Gundling v. ChicagoSearch
-
must be strictly on an ad valorem basis -- without variance even as between real and personal property ( Verdery v. VillageSearch
-
Mayor v. WeedSearch
-
may be resorted to, and the taxes adjusted according to reasonable methods of classification. Atlanta National Assn. v. StewartSearch
-
upon the privilege of transfer upon death of an owner, were held valid, although not ad valorem, in Farkas v. SmithSearch
-
warrant for putting them in a class by themselves for excise taxation upon their sale or use. So we held, in Bowman v. ContinentalSearch
-
materially. While some of the Georgia decisions indicate a rather strict view of the uniformity required ( Johnson v. MayorSearch
-
Beckett v. MayorSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Texas Co. v. BrownSearch
-
Texas Company v. BrownSearch
-
Askren v. ContinentalSearch
-
Greene v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Ratterman v. WesternSearch
-
Bowman v. ContinentalSearch
-
But American Steel & Wire Co. v. SpeedSearch
-
of Woodruff v. ParhamSearch
-
and Brown v. HoustonSearch
-
Brown v. HoustonSearch
-
St. Louis S.W. Ry. v. ArkansasSearch
-
of the Fourteenth Amendment. Gundling v. ChicagoSearch
-
Verdery v. VillageSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial