Citation network
Hill Vs. Wallace
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 15, 1922
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 44 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court Hill v. WallaceSearch
-
U.S. 44 (1922) Hill v. WallaceSearch
-
inapplicable to this case because of its exceptional and extraordinary circumstances. P. 259 U. S. 62 . Dodge v. BradySearch
-
equitable grounds to justify granting the relief they ask. We think it clear that, within the cases of Smith v. KansasSearch
-
City Title Co., 255 U. S. 180 , Brushaber v. UnionSearch
-
Pacific R. Co., 240 U. S. 1 , 240 U. S. 10 , Pollock v. Farmers'Search
-
Loan & Trust Co., 157 U. S. 429 , and Dodge v. WoolseySearch
-
the duty of the Board of directors to bring an action to resist its enforcement. It is quite like the case of Dodge v. WoolseySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
They must be taken to have admitted this by the motion to dismiss. Page 259 U. S. 62 In Wathen v. JacksonSearch
-
Oil Co., 235 U. S. 635 , and in Corbus v. GoldSearch
-
McFarland v. AmericanSearch
-
It has been held by this Court, in Dodge v. BradySearch
-
in which some extraordinary and entirely exceptional circumstances make its provisions inapplicable. See also Dodge v. OsbornSearch
-
act will therefore have the same effect as did the judgment of the Court in respect to the income tax law in Pollock v. Farmers'Search
-
of the Child Labor Tax Law, completely covers this case. We there distinguish between cases like Veazie Bank v. FennoSearch
-
Wall. 533, and McCray v. UnitedSearch
-
Such regulations are held to be within the police powers of the state. House v. MayesSearch
-
Broadnax v. MissouriSearch
-
which certainly would accompany and mark an exercise of the power under the latter clause. In Ware & Leland v. MobileSearch
-
it, as directly interfering with interstate commerce so as to be an obstruction or a burden thereon. United States v. FergerSearch
-
U. S. 199 . It was upon this principle that, in Stafford v. WallaceSearch
-
unless regulated, to impose a direct burden on the interstate commerce passing through. So, too, in United States v. PattenSearch
-
in cotton was sustained under the first and second sections of the Sherman Anti-Trust Law. This case, like Stafford v. WallaceSearch
-
followed the principles of Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
limitations it does not contain. This is legislative work beyond the power and function of the court. In United States v. ReeseSearch
-
Butts v. MerchantsSearch
-
Such a tax, without more, would seem to be within the congressional Page 259 U. S. 72 power. Treat v. WhiteSearch
-
Thomas v. UnitedSearch
-
of a statute alleged to be unconstitutional, is well settled, and the rule has been recently applied. Wathen v. JacksonSearch
-
Corbus v. GoldSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hill v. WallaceSearch
-
of Smith v. KansasSearch
-
Brushaber v. UnionSearch
-
Pollock v. Farmers'Search
-
and Dodge v. WoolseySearch
-
of Dodge v. WoolseySearch
-
In Wathen v. JacksonSearch
-
and McCray v. UnitedSearch
-
In Ware & Leland v. MobileSearch
-
of Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. ReeseSearch
-
Treat v. WhiteSearch
-
Wathen v. JacksonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial