Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Lipke Vs. Lederer

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 05, 1922

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 8 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Yuginovich US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1921
  2. Hartman Vs. Bean US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1878
  3. Dodge Vs. Osborn US Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1916
  4. Shelton Vs. Platt US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1891
  5. Singer Sewing Machine Co. Vs. Benedict US Supreme Court · May 05, 1913
  6. Towne Vs. Eisner US Supreme Court · Jan 07, 1918
  7. O'Sullivan Vs. Felix US Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1914
  8. Snyder Vs. Marks US Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1883
  9. U.S. 557 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court Lipke v. Lederer
    Search
  10. U.S. 557 (1922) Lipke v. Lederer
    Search
  11. Page 259 U. S. 558 MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. Relying upon Ketterer v. Lederer
    Search
  12. conflicts with the federal Constitution. The point is substantial, and sufficient to support our jurisdiction. Towne v. Eisner
    Search
  13. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Bondurant
    Search
  14. South Covington & Cincinnati Street Ry. Co. v. Newport
    Search
  15. When, by its Page 259 U. S. 562 very nature the imposition is a penalty, it must be so regarded. Helwig v. United
    Search
  16. clearly involves the idea of punishment for infraction of the law -- the definite function of a penalty. O'Sullivan v. Felix
    Search
  17. this is essential to due process of law. Central of Georgia Ry. v. Wright
    Search
  18. officers. The guaranties of due process of law and trial by jury are not be forgotten or disregarded. See Fontenot v. Accardo
    Search
  19. Tit. II, of the Volstead Act, and even if it be deemed unconstitutional. Compare Bailey v. George
    Search
  20. Blacklock v. United
    Search
  21. States, 208 U. S. 75 . Compare Scottish Union & National Insurance Co. v. Bowland
    Search
  22. suit will not lie to restrain its collection. Snyder v. Marks
    Search
  23. and on this question the lower courts have differed. As was said by this Court in Arkansas Building & Loan Association v. Madden
    Search
  24. Ry. v. Board
    Search
  25. Arkansas Building & Loan Association v. Madden
    Search
  26. Indiana Manufacturing Co. v. Koehne
    Search
  27. Boise Artesian Water Co. v. Boise
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Lipke v. Lederer
    Search
  29. Ketterer v. Lederer
    Search
  30. Helwig v. United
    Search
  31. Central of Georgia Ry. v. Wright
    Search
  32. See Fontenot v. Accardo
    Search
  33. Compare Bailey v. George
    Search
  34. Compare Scottish Union & National Insurance Co. v. Bowland
    Search
  35. Ry. v. Board
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales