Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Zucht Vs. King

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 13, 1922

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 2 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Champion Lumber Co. Vs. Fisher US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1913
  2. Neal Vs. Delaware US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  3. U.S. 174 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court Zucht v. King
    Search
  4. U.S. 174 (1922) Zucht v. King
    Search
  5. a law is sustained by the highest court of the state in which a decision in the suit could be had. Atlantic Coast Line v. Goldsboro
    Search
  6. question presented is not, and was not at the time of granting the writ, substantial in character. Sugarman v. United
    Search
  7. States, 249 U. S. 182 , 249 U. S. 184 . Long before this suit was instituted, Jacobson v. Massachusetts
    Search
  8. authority to determine under what conditions health regulations shall become operative. Laurel Hill Cemetery v. San
    Search
  9. vest in its officials broad discretion in matters affecting the application and enforcement of a health law. Lieberman v. Van
    Search
  10. and that regulation is not violative of the equal protection clause merely because it is not all-embracing. Adams v. Milwaukee
    Search
  11. Miller v. Wilson
    Search
  12. no question as to the validity of the ordinance sufficiently substantial to support the writ of error. Unlike Yick Wo v. Hopkins
    Search
  13. as to deny to her equal protection of the laws. These averments do present a substantial constitutional question. Neal v. Delaware
    Search
  14. the validity of the ordinance, nor does it go to the validity of the authority of the officials. Compare United States v. Taft
    Search
  15. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley R. Co. v. Clarksdale
    Search
  16. This charge is of an unconstitutional exercise of authority under an ordinance which is valid. Compare Stadelman v. Miner
    Search
  17. U.S. Supreme Court Zucht v. King
    Search
  18. Atlantic Coast Line v. Goldsboro
    Search
  19. Sugarman v. United
    Search
  20. Jacobson v. Massachusetts
    Search
  21. Laurel Hill Cemetery v. San
    Search
  22. Lieberman v. Van
    Search
  23. Adams v. Milwaukee
    Search
  24. Unlike Yick Wo v. Hopkins
    Search
  25. Compare United States v. Taft
    Search
  26. Compare Stadelman v. Miner
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial