Citation network
KleIn Vs. Burke Construction Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 20, 1922
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Klein v. BurkeSearch
-
Construction Co. - 260 U.S. 226 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court Klein v. BurkeSearch
-
Construction Co., 260 U.S. 226 (1922) Klein v. BurkeSearch
-
See Julian v. CentralSearch
-
Lanning v. OsborneSearch
-
its jurisdiction over the same res to defeat or impair the state court's jurisdiction. This Court, in Covell v. HeymanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
And the same rule applies where a person is in custody under the authority of the court of another jurisdiction. Ponzi v. FessendenSearch
-
seeks only a personal judgment, another action for the same cause in another jurisdiction is not precluded. Stanton v. EmbreySearch
-
Hunt v. NewSearch
-
Insurance Co. v. PageSearch
-
Merritt v. AmericanSearch
-
Ball v. TompkinsSearch
-
Holmes County v. BurtonSearch
-
Standley v. RobertsSearch
-
Green v. UnderwoodSearch
-
Ogden City v. WeaverSearch
-
Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. WabashSearch
-
Guardian Trust Co. v. KansasSearch
-
Woren v. WitherbeeSearch
-
W. E. Stewart Land Co. v. ArthurSearch
-
F. 184. In Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. WabashSearch
-
a principle of right and law, and therefore of necessity. It leaves nothing to discretion or mere convenience.' Covell v. HeymanSearch
-
administer trusts, or liquidate insolvent estates, and in all suits of a like nature. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. LakeSearch
-
Merritt v. SteelSearch
-
of that jurisdiction, nor lead to a conflict of authority where each court acts in accordance with law. Stanton v. EmbreySearch
-
In Stewart Land Co. v. ArthurSearch
-
jurisdiction at its discretion, provided it be not extended beyond the boundaries fixed by the Constitution. Turner v. BankSearch
-
capacity to take jurisdiction in the enumerated cases, but it requires an act of Congress to confer it. The Mayor v. CooperSearch
-
and if withdrawn without a saving clause, all pending cases though cognizable when commenced must fall. Assessors v. OsbornesSearch
-
and proceed to judgment. It could not abdicate its authority or duty in favor of the state jurisdiction. Chicot County v. SherwoodSearch
-
that the rights of the litigants to invoke the jurisdiction of the respective courts are of equal rank. See Heidritter v. ElizabethSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Klein v. BurkeSearch
-
In Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. WabashSearch
-
Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. LakeSearch
-
the Constitution. Turner v. BankSearch
-
Assessors v. OsbornesSearch
-
See Heidritter v. ElizabethSearch
-
United States v. HudsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial