Citation network
United States Vs. Lanza
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 11, 1922
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 377 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. LanzaSearch
-
U.S. 377 (1922) United States v. LanzaSearch
-
government demurred to the plea. The district court sustained the plea and dismissed the five counts. United States v. PetersonSearch
-
heretofore arising out of the federal Constitution. This is the ratio decidendi of our decision in Vigliotti v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
the other guaranties in the first eight amendments, applies only to proceedings by the federal government, Barron v. CitySearch
-
double jeopardy. This view of the Fifth Amendment is supported by a long line of decisions by this Court. In Fox v. OhioSearch
-
This conclusion was affirmed in United States v. MarigoldSearch
-
Page 260 U. S. 384 The principle was reaffirmed in Moore v. IllinoisSearch
-
How. 13, in United States v. CruikshankSearch
-
U. S. 550 -551, in Ex Parte Siebold, 100 U. S. 371 , 100 U. S. 389 , 390-391, in Cross v. NorthSearch
-
Carolina, 132 U. S. 131 , 132 U. S. 139 , in Pettibone v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States, 148 U. S. 197 , 148 U. S. 209 , in Crossley v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Comm'n of Indiana, 236 U. S. 439 , in Gilbert v. MinnesotaSearch
-
U. S. 325 , 254 U. S. 330 , and, finally, in McKelvey v. UnitedSearch
-
States, ante, 260 U. S. 353 . In Southern Ry. Co. v. RailroadSearch
-
In support of this position, numerous cases are cited, which, like Cross v. NorthSearch
-
which has held conviction in a state court a bar to prosecution for the same act under the Volstead Law. United States v. HoltSearch
-
United States v. BostowSearch
-
United States v. RatagczakSearch
-
the one which first gets jurisdiction may first exhaust its jurisdiction to the exclusion of the other. Ponzi v. FessendenSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. LanzaSearch
-
United States v. PetersonSearch
-
Vigliotti v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Barron v. CitySearch
-
Court. In Fox v. OhioSearch
-
Moore v. IllinoisSearch
-
Cross v. NorthSearch
-
Pettibone v. UnitedSearch
-
Crossley v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Gilbert v. MinnesotaSearch
-
McKelvey v. UnitedSearch
-
In Southern Ry. Co. v. RailroadSearch
-
the Volstead Law. United States v. HoltSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial