Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

ChamplaIn Realty Co. Vs. Brattleboro

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 11, 1922

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 3 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. Coe Vs. Errol US Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1886
  2. General Oil Co. Vs. Crain US Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1908
  3. American Steel and Wire Co. Vs. Speed US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1904
  4. U.S. 366 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court Champlain Realty Co. v. Brattleboro
    Search
  5. U.S. 366 (1922) Champlain Realty Company v. Town
    Search
  6. saving them from loss, are in interstate commerce, and not subject to state taxation. P. 260 U. S. 371 . Coe v. Errol
    Search
  7. case, delivered the opinion of the Court. The Vermont Supreme Court depended for its conclusions chiefly upon Coe v. Errol
    Search
  8. causes, over which he could exercise no control, would have been actually continuous. This was not the case in Coe v. Errol
    Search
  9. The case at bar is easily distinguishable from the other cases cited by the Vermont Supreme Court. In Bacon v. Illinois
    Search
  10. commerce journey, and brought the grain within the taxable jurisdiction of the state. So, in General Oil Co. v. Crain
    Search
  11. for preparing the oil for another interstate journey. So far as it bears upon this case, American Steel and Wire Co. v. Speed
    Search
  12. U. S. 500 , presented a similar state of facts and ruling. In Diamond Match Co. v. Ontonagon
    Search
  13. company, and there was no interstate commerce until the final shipment to Green Bay began. In the cases of Brown v. Houston
    Search
  14. U. S. 622 , and Pittsburg Coal Co. v. Bates
    Search
  15. are only to promote the safe or convenient transit, then the continuity of the interstate trip is not broken. State v. Engle
    Search
  16. State v. Carrigan
    Search
  17. N.J.Law 36. This was the case in Kelley v. Rhoads
    Search
  18. taxation in Wyoming where they stopped and grazed on their way. Another instance is as to that part of the logs in Coe v. Errol
    Search
  19. in the intermediate state did not destroy interstate continuity of the trip. But this was not always so, as Bacon v. Illinois
    Search
  20. and General Oil Co. v. Crain
    Search
  21. Of all the cases in this Court where such movable property has been held taxable, none is nearer in its facts than Coe v. Errol
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Champlain Realty Co. v. Brattleboro
    Search
  23. Champlain Realty Company v. Town
    Search
  24. the Vermont Supreme Court. In Bacon v. Illinois
    Search
  25. In Diamond Match Co. v. Ontonagon
    Search
  26. of Brown v. Houston
    Search
  27. and Pittsburg Coal Co. v. Bates
    Search
  28. State v. Engle
    Search
  29. Kelley v. Rhoads
    Search
  30. Bacon v. Illinois
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial