Citation network
Wyoming Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 28, 1921
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Wyoming v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 255 U.S. 489 (1921) U.S. Supreme Court Wyoming v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 255 U.S. 489 (1921) Wyoming v. UnitedSearch
-
tract selected or a subsequent discovery that it contains mineral. P. 255 U. S. 497 . Wisconsin Central R. Co. v. PriceSearch
-
County, 133 U. S. 496 , and Cosmos Exploration Co. v. GraySearch
-
rendered as decree dismissing the bill on the merits, which the circuit court of appeals reversed ( United States v. RidgelySearch
-
equal acreage from unappropriated nonmineral public lands outside the reservation and within the state. See California v. DeseretSearch
-
Payne v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The conclusion which we deem plain in principle is fully sustained by prior adjudications. In Benson Mining Co. v. AltaSearch
-
In Colorado Coal & Iron Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. IronSearch
-
Particularly in point is Shaw v. KelloggSearch
-
In Leonard v. LennoxSearch
-
The last expression on this subject in this Court is found in Payne v. NewSearch
-
that this right is not defeated or affected Page 255 U. S. 501 by a subsequent mineral discovery. California v. PoleySearch
-
Rice v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Harnish v. WallaceSearch
-
Rea v. StephensonSearch
-
Reid v. LavalleeSearch
-
Aspen Consolidated Mining Co. v. WilliamsSearch
-
Diamond Coal & Coke Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Kern Oil Co. v. ClarkeSearch
-
selections. But afterwards, the Secretary, conceiving that the decisions of this Court in Wisconsin Central R. Co. v. PriceSearch
-
after a full review, the changed ruling of the Secretary was disapproved and Daniels' contention sustained. Daniels v. WagnerSearch
-
that the contrary view found no justification in Cosmos Exploration Co. v. GraySearch
-
and that the real authority and duty of the Secretary in dealing with such selections were pointed out in Weyerhaeuser v. HoytSearch
-
power to approve lists of selections conferred on the Secretary was clearly pointed out in Wisconsin Central Railroad v. PriceSearch
-
be taken so broadly is illustrated by the fact that it cited with approval the case of Saint Paul & Sioux City R. Co. v. WinonaSearch
-
not such as could be entertained or investigated by the Land Department. That case and another ( Riverside Oil Co. v. HitchcockSearch
-
administration of its public land laws, and that jurisdiction cannot be taken away from it by the court. United States v. SchurzSearch
-
should the question properly arise in future litigation. The general expressions were relied upon in Daniels v. WagnerSearch
-
the Secretary, through an error of law, rejects the selection. And that ruling was reaffirmed and applied in Payne v. CentralSearch
-
Pacific Ry. Co., ante, 255 U. S. 228 , and Payne v. NewSearch
-
Central Pacific R. Co. v. ValentineSearch
-
the matter came before this Court and the construction and practice of the Land Department were sustained. Barden v. NorthernSearch
-
rights under other land laws are to be tested by a different rule. And this is emphasized by the fact that, in Shaw v. KelloggSearch
-
designed to aid the common schools of the states is to be construed liberally, rather than restrictively. Beecher v. WetherbySearch
-
U. S. 509 the lieu selection was lawfully made it suffices to say, following the recent decision in Payne v. CentralSearch
-
law in rejecting the selection, and that the district court rightly entered a decree for the defendants. See Cornelius v. KesselSearch
-
United States v. DetroitSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Wyoming v. UnitedSearch
-
Wisconsin Central R. Co. v. PriceSearch
-
and Cosmos Exploration Co. v. GraySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial