Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 11, 1921

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 2 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. Weyerhaeuser Vs. Hoyt US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1911
  2. Hewitt Vs. Schultz US Supreme Court · Jan 07, 1901
  3. sections within the place limits, due to partial overlapping with another like grant ( Southern Pacific R. Co. v. United
    Search
  4. or claimed or occupied by homestead settlers, or preempted prior to the definite location of the line. Nelson v. Northern
    Search
  5. out of the operation of those laws by indemnity selections made to supply losses within the place limits ( Hewitt v. Schultz
    Search
  6. Doherty v. Northern
    Search
  7. United States v. Northern
    Search
  8. a contract, as to which the company, by performing its part, became entitled to performance by the government. Burke v. Southern
    Search
  9. relating to indemnity lands was as much a part of the grant and contract as the one relating to land in place, Payne v. Central
    Search
  10. of the particular lands sought to be taken. This distinctions is illustrated in St. Paul and Pacific R. Co. v. Northern
    Search
  11. to the general rule that a selection is essential has been recognized by this Court in other cases. United States v. Missouri
    Search
  12. United States v. Colton
    Search
  13. Southern Pacific R. Co. v. Bell
    Search
  14. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Wagner
    Search
  15. conferred by that provision ( Weyerhaeuser v. Hoyt
    Search
  16. might conclude both parties for all time -- as respects other lands as well as those in suit. Southern Pacific R. Co. v. United
    Search
  17. upon the present record. Turning to the published decisions of the Land Department, we find that, in Hessey v. Northern
    Search
  18. Southern Pacific R. Co. v. United
    Search
  19. Sioux City & St. Paul R. Co. v. United
    Search
  20. States, 159 U. S. 349 , 159 U. S. 364 -365. And see United States v. Northern
    Search
  21. Nelson v. Northern
    Search
  22. Burke v. Southern
    Search
  23. Payne v. Central
    Search
  24. St. Paul and Pacific R. Co. v. Northern
    Search
  25. United States v. Missouri
    Search
  26. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Wagner
    Search
  27. Hessey v. Northern
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales