Citation network
Shaffer Vs. Carter
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 01, 1920
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 37 (1920) U.S. Supreme Court Shaffer v. CarterSearch
-
U.S. 37 (1920) Shaffer v. CarterSearch
-
Judicial Code, was denied, one Judge dissenting. Shaffer v. HowardSearch
-
levy and tax warrant creates a cloud upon his title. This entitles him to bring suit in equity ( Union Pacific Ry. Co. v. CheyenneSearch
-
Greene v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
for an appeal from that board to the district court of the county. In a recent decision ( Berryhill v. CarterSearch
-
Upon this ground, in Gipsy Page 252 U. S. 48 Oil Co. v. HowardSearch
-
but they did not press the point, and the decrees were affirmed upon the merits of the federal question. Howard v. GipsySearch
-
a multiplicity of suits, the jurisdiction extends to the disposition of all questions raised by the bill. Camp v. BoydSearch
-
like, and the jurisdiction to act remains even though all permissible measures be not resorted to. Michigan Trust Co. v. FerrySearch
-
to impose a tax upon the income of nonresidents, while raised in the present case, was more emphasized in Travis v. YaleSearch
-
respect to the imposition of internal taxes always has been recognized in the decisions of this Court. In McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
State Tax on Foreign-Held Bonds, 15 Wall. 300, 82 U. S. 319 . See also Welton v. MissouriSearch
-
Armour & Co. v. VirginiaSearch
-
consonant with numerous decisions of this Court sustaining state taxation of credits due to nonresidents, New Orleans v. StempelSearch
-
Bristol v. WashingtonSearch
-
Ins. Co. v. OrleansSearch
-
federal taxation of the income of an alien nonresident derived from securities held in this country, De Ganay v. LedererSearch
-
him against discriminatory taxation, but gives him no right to be favored by discrimination or exemption. See Ward v. MarylandSearch
-
States. It is insisted, however, both by appellant in this case and by the opponents of the New York law in Travis v. YaleSearch
-
form, construction, or definition, but upon the practical operation and effect of the tax imposed. St. Louis S.W. Ry. v. ArkansasSearch
-
subjected in property or person to taxes more onerous than the citizens of the latter state are subjected to. Paul v. VirginiaSearch
-
U. S. 525 , 250 U. S. 537 . The judge who dissented in Shaffer v. HowardSearch
-
commerce, it is sufficient to say that the tax is imposed not upon the gross receipts, as in Crew Levick Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
the net proceeds, and is plainly sustainable even if it includes net gains from interstate commerce. U.S. Glue C. v. OakSearch
-
Creek, 247 U. S. 321 . Compare Peck & Co. v. LoweSearch
-
form of unequal taxation, so long as the inequality is not based up on arbitrary distinctions. St. Louis S.W. Railway v. ArkansasSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Shaffer v. CarterSearch
-
Union Pacific Ry. Co. v. CheyenneSearch
-
Berryhill v. CarterSearch
-
Oil Co. v. HowardSearch
-
Howard v. GipsySearch
-
Travis v. YaleSearch
-
Court. In McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
In Michigan Central Railroad v. PowersSearch
-
Welton v. MissouriSearch
-
Ins. Co. v. OrleansSearch
-
De Ganay v. LedererSearch
-
See Ward v. MarylandSearch
-
St. Louis S.W. Ry. v. ArkansasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial