Citation network
Collins Vs. Miller
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 29, 1920
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 364 (1920) U.S. Supreme Court Collins v. MillerSearch
-
U.S. 364 (1920) Collins v. MillerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of the Judicial Code. Charlton v. KellySearch
-
has jurisdiction on writ of error and appeal under that section, as under others, only from final judgments. McLish v. RoffSearch
-
Heike v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 217 U. S. 423 . And the rule applies to habeas corpus proceedings. Harkrader v. WadleySearch
-
suggested itself to the Court, and it must be answered although it was not raised by either party. Defiance Water Co. v. DefianceSearch
-
more appropriately dismissal, of the writ would obviously have been a final judgment if it had stood alone. McNamara v. HenkelSearch
-
U. S. 160 , and in In re Bonner, 151 U. S. 242 , or made conditional as in United States v. PetkosSearch
-
F. 978, Billings v. SitnerSearch
-
before a committing magistrate in international extradition is not subject to correction by appeal. See Fong Yue Ting v. UnitedSearch
-
Sternaman v. PeckSearch
-
to assume control in the preliminary stages of matters of which it has the final decision under the law. United States v. BerrySearch
-
The Mary, 233 F. 121, 124. Compare Todd v. UnitedSearch
-
F. 950, 954. For an extradition commissioner is an officer of the court which appoints him. See Griffin v. ShineSearch
-
Chin Yow v. UnitedSearch
-
Whitfield v. HangesSearch
-
United States v. WilliamsSearch
-
or writ of error in fragments. To be appealable, the judgment must be not only final, but complete. United States v. GiraultSearch
-
Grant v. PhoenixSearch
-
Covington v. CovingtonSearch
-
Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-CollenderSearch
-
the parties, but as to the whole subject matter and as to all the causes of action involved. Louisiana Navigation Co. v. OysterSearch
-
Sheppy v. StevensSearch
-
so as to authorize an appeal without awaiting the termination of the general litigation below, Central Trust Co. v. GrantSearch
-
Williams v. MorganSearch
-
U. S. 527 , has no application here. Nor have cases like Forgay v. ConradSearch
-
How. 201, 47 U. S. 204 , and Thomson v. DeanSearch
-
and the marshal was the party in whom rested the right to appeal if Collins prevailed on final judgment. See Charlton v. KellySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Collins v. MillerSearch
-
United States v. PetkosSearch
-
Billings v. SitnerSearch
-
See Fong Yue Ting v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BerrySearch
-
Compare Todd v. UnitedSearch
-
See Griffin v. ShineSearch
-
Chin Yow v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial