Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Houston Vs. Ormes

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 19, 1920

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 5 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Goodman Vs. Niblack US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  2. Price Vs. Forrest US Supreme Court · Mar 06, 1899
  3. Board of Liquidation Vs. Mccomb US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  4. Parish Vs. Macveagh US Supreme Court · May 17, 1909
    Relied / Followed
  5. Wells Vs. Roper US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1918
  6. U.S. 469 (1920) U.S. Supreme Court Houston v. Ormes
    Search
  7. U.S. 469 (1920) Houston v. Ormes
    Search
  8. the government. So it has been declared by this Court in many cases relating to state officers. Board of Liquidation v. McComb
    Search
  9. Louisiana v. Junel
    Search
  10. In re Ayers, 123 U. S. 443 , 123 U. S. 506 . In Minnesota v. Hitchcock
    Search
  11. And in Parish v. MacVeagh
    Search
  12. to have a mandamus against the Secretary of the Treasury requiring him to pay the claim. To the same effect, Roberts v. United
    Search
  13. The practice of bringing suits in equity for this purpose is well established in the courts of the District. Sanborn v. Maxwell
    Search
  14. Roberts v. Consaul
    Search
  15. Jones v. Rutherford
    Search
  16. Parish v. McGowan
    Search
  17. App.D.C. 184, s.c. on appeal McGowan v. Parish
    Search
  18. not stand in the way of giving effect to an assignment by operation of law after the claim has been allowed. Erwin v. United
    Search
  19. court of equity may not control the action of an officer of the United States within the scope of his authority, Wells v. Roper
    Search
  20. It is further objected that debts due from the United States have no situs at the seat of government, and Vaughan v. Northup
    Search
  21. Pet. 1, 40 U. S. 6 , Mackey v. Cox
    Search
  22. How. 100, 59 U. S. 105 , and Wyman v. Halstead
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Houston v. Ormes
    Search
  24. In Minnesota v. Hitchcock
    Search
  25. Roberts v. United
    Search
  26. of the District. Sanborn v. Maxwell
    Search
  27. Erwin v. United
    Search
  28. and Vaughan v. Northup
    Search
  29. Mackey v. Cox
    Search
  30. and Wyman v. Halstead
    Search
  31. McGowan v. Parish
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial