Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Cameron Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 19, 1920

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 8 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. Cole Vs. Ralph US Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1920
  2. United States Vs. Schurz US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  3. Riverside Oil Co. Vs. Hitchcock US Supreme Court · May 18, 1903
  4. Witherspoon Vs. Duncan US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1866
  5. Orchard Vs. Alexander US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1895
  6. Parsons Vs. Venzke US Supreme Court · Nov 02, 1896
  7. Carroll Vs. Safford US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1845
  8. Catholic Bishop of Nesqually Vs. Gibbon US Supreme Court · May 06, 1895
  9. Cameron v. United
    Search
  10. States - 252 U.S. 450 (1920) U.S. Supreme Court Cameron v. United
    Search
  11. States, 252 U.S. 450 (1920) Cameron v. United
    Search
  12. Grand Canyon Ry. Co. v. Cameron
    Search
  13. a novel or mistaken test, but is one which the Land Department long has applied and this Court has approved. Chrisman v. Miller
    Search
  14. Lee v. Johnson
    Search
  15. Knight v. United
    Search
  16. the claim is valid and, if it be found invalid, to declare it null and void. This is well illustrated in Orchard v. Alexander
    Search
  17. an interest of which he cannot be arbitrarily dispossessed. His interest is subject to state taxation. Carroll v. Safford
    Search
  18. And to the same effect is Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. Rust
    Search
  19. such equitable title, and upon a hearing, to determine the question whether or not such title has passed. Cornelius v. Kessel
    Search
  20. questions in the Page 252 U. S. 462 exercise of its general authority, and in Catholic Bishop of Nesqually v. Gibbon
    Search
  21. And in Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gary
    Search
  22. it does not reach or affect other controversies, and so is without present bearing. Creede & Cripple Creek Mining Co. v. Uinta
    Search
  23. instances in which its exercise has received judicial sanction are found in Lane v. Cameron
    Search
  24. App.D.C. 404, and Cameron v. Bass
    Search
  25. in which its existence received substantial, if not decisive, recognition by this Court is found in Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli
    Search
  26. the Interior was conclusive in the absence of fraud or imposition, and none was claimed. Catholic Bishop of Nesqually v. Gibbon
    Search
  27. Burfenning v. Chicago
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Cameron v. United
    Search
  29. Grand Canyon Ry. Co. v. Cameron
    Search
  30. Chrisman v. Miller
    Search
  31. Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. Rust
    Search
  32. Cornelius v. Kessel
    Search
  33. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gary
    Search
  34. Creede & Cripple Creek Mining Co. v. Uinta
    Search
  35. Lane v. Cameron
    Search
  36. and Cameron v. Bass
    Search
  37. Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial