Citation network
United States Vs. Reading Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 26, 1920
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Co. - 253 U.S. 26 (1920) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ReadingSearch
-
Co., 253 U.S. 26 (1920) United States v. ReadingSearch
-
and coal companies for suppressing competition, which were declared violations of the Anti-Trust Act in United States v. ReadingSearch
-
intent and purpose Page 253 U. S. 44 with which the combinations here assailed were formed. Standard Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
This constituted a combination to unduly restrain interstate commerce within the meaning of the act. United States v. UnionSearch
-
thus served to pool the property, the activities, and the profits of the three companies. Northern Securities Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
that company, although only one of six, became responsible for 30 percent of the required financing. In United States v. ReadingSearch
-
Anti-Trust Act has been frequently held by this Court. Page 253 U. S. 58 Thus, in Northern Securities Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
And again, in United States v. UnionSearch
-
conclusion of this Court in 1914, when discussing a similar state Anti-Trust Act in International Harvester Co. v. MissouriSearch
-
perfectly established law. It is ruled by many decisions of this Court, but specifically and clearly by United States v. UnionSearch
-
as a legal doctrine, concluded, upon the authority of United States v. DelawareSearch
-
of the latter as to bring it within the prohibition of the act. But this holding was considered in United States v. LehighSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
treating it as a mere agency or department of the owning company. This rule was repeated and applied in United States v. DelawareSearch
-
if the corporate agency did not exist, and will deal with them as the justice of the case may require. United States v. LehighSearch
-
United States v. DelawareSearch
-
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R. Co. v. MinneapolisSearch
-
United States v. LehighSearch
-
which it took and also demonstrates the error involved in the decree of this Court reversing its action. United States v. ReadingSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ReadingSearch
-
Standard Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. UnionSearch
-
Northern Securities Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. ReadingSearch
-
of United States v. DelawareSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial