Citation network
Newman Vs. Moyers
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 17, 1920
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 182 (1920) U.S. Supreme Court Newman v. MoyersSearch
-
U.S. 182 (1920) Newman v. MoyersSearch
-
by attorneys in respect of the claims therein appropriated for, is valid. P. 253 U. S. 185 . Calhoun v. MassieSearch
-
the opinion of the Court. By Omnibus Claims Act March 4, 1915, c. 140, 38 Stat. 962, 963, discussed in Calhoun v. MassieSearch
-
the sum collected. Its terms and the services rendered were, in substance, identical with those set forth in Calhoun v. MassieSearch
-
the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Treasurer of the United States to recover the full fifty percent. As in McGowan v. ParishSearch
-
the compensation which the attorneys may collect or receive to twenty percent The act is valid. Capital Trust Co. v. CalhounSearch
-
to dismiss the bill even if none of the defendants had raised any objection to the maintenance of the suit. Oscanyan v. ArmsSearch
-
Lee v. JohnsonSearch
-
administratrix did not persist in her appeal should not result in affirmance of the judgment as to her. In Montalet v. MurraySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
This practice is still in force under Rules 9 and 16 of this Court. Todd v. DanielSearch
-
U. S. 450 -451. It is applicable to one of several joint appellants who fails to perfect his appeal. Yates v. JonesSearch
-
purpose of the suit. But the Court might go further. Since, of its own motion, it might dismiss this appeal ( Hilton v. DickinsonSearch
-
U. S. 168 ), and since, on dismissing it, a mandate to the lower court might issue ( United States v. GomezSearch
-
be free to take appropriate action to prevent itself from being used as an instrument in illegality. United States v. PachecoSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Newman v. MoyersSearch
-
Oscanyan v. ArmsSearch
-
In Montalet v. MurraySearch
-
Court. Todd v. DanielSearch
-
Yates v. JonesSearch
-
United States v. GomezSearch
-
McGowan v. ParishSearch
-
United States v. PachecoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial