Citation network
Knickerbnocker Ice Co. Vs. Stewart
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 17, 1920
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 149 (1920) U.S. Supreme Court Knickerbnocker Ice Co. v. StewartSearch
-
U.S. 149 (1920) Knickerbnocker Ice Company v. StewartSearch
-
to be construed Page 253 U. S. 150 as intending to obviate the objection pointed out in Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
minor children, and both Appellate Page 253 U. S. 156 Division and the Court of Appeals approved it. Stewart v. KnickerbockerSearch
-
us to hold the compensation law inapplicable to an employee engaged in maritime work -- Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
Page 253 U. S. 157 In Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
affairs, the statute would obstruct the policy of Congress to encourage investments in ships. In Chelentis v. LuckenbachSearch
-
Under the doctrine approved in Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
In Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
continued enforcement by the state courts of rights and obligations founded on maritime law. In Union Fish Co. v. EricksonSearch
-
this be true, it is quite impossible to account for a multitude of adjudications by the admiralty courts. See Workman v. NewSearch
-
of the Act of October 6, 1917, is difficult, perhaps impossible. The Howell, 257 F. 578, and Rohde v. GrantSearch
-
admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, and to save such statutes from the objections pointed out by Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
only contemplated, but actually established -- it would defeat the very purpose of the grant. See Sudden & Christenson v. IndustrialSearch
-
Interstate Commerce Commission v. GoodrichSearch
-
Transit Co., 224 U. S. 194 , 224 U. S. 214 . In Clark Distilling Co. v. WesternSearch
-
See Delamater v. SouthSearch
-
conditions, and provides novel remedies incapable of enforcement by an admiralty court. See New York Central R. Co. v. WhiteSearch
-
competent to give it.' It was declared by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE HOLMES, dissenting. In Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
repeated the words used by the Page 253 U. S. 168 several states -- a not unfamiliar form of law. Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
Cooley v. BoardSearch
-
Interstate Consolidated Street Ry. Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Franklin v. UnitedSearch
-
Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. WesternSearch
-
taken to refer solely to laws existing at the time, as it certainly does at least include them. See United States v. PaulSearch
-
and I may add by way of anticipation, included at least some subsequent statutory changes. Steamboat Co. v. ChaseSearch
-
Kaapp, Stone & Co. v. McCaffreySearch
-
Rounds v. CloverportSearch
-
may make different arrangements for widely different localities with perhaps widely different needs. See United States v. PressSearch
-
Publishing Co., 219 U. S. 1 , 219 U. S. 9 . I thought that Clark Distilling Co. v. WesternSearch
-
This was held by the unanimous Court to be binding in Amy v. WatertownSearch
-
No. 1, 130 U. S. 301 . See Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Knickerbnocker Ice Co. v. StewartSearch
-
Knickerbnocker Ice Company v. StewartSearch
-
Stewart v. KnickerbockerSearch
-
In Chelentis v. LuckenbachSearch
-
In Union Fish Co. v. EricksonSearch
-
See Workman v. NewSearch
-
and Rohde v. GrantSearch
-
See Sudden & Christenson v. IndustrialSearch
-
In Clark Distilling Co. v. WesternSearch
-
See New York Central R. Co. v. WhiteSearch
-
of Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial