Citation network
Stallings Vs. Splain
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 01, 1920
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 339 (1920) U.S. Supreme Court Stallings v. SplainSearch
-
U.S. 339 (1920) Stallings v. SplainSearch
-
in which he is found, and be detained for the reasonable time necessary to enable a requisition to be made. Burton v. NewSearch
-
York Central & Hudson River R. Co., 245 U. S. 315 , 245 U. S. 318 . See Kurtz v. MuffittSearch
-
as evidence that Splain had reasonable cause to believe that a felony had been committed by Stallings. Commonwealth v. PhelpsSearch
-
marshal into that of the court, and he remained under its protection and control although enlarged on bail. Barth v. CliseSearch
-
become immune from all other process until the habeas corpus proceedings should been finally disposed of. Commonwealth v. HallSearch
-
would merely have been whether a second arrest could properly be made where it conflicted with the first. Peckham v. HenkelSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
detention exists, a prisoner will not be discharged for defects in the original arrest or commitment. Nishimura Ekiu v. UnitedSearch
-
Iasigi v. VanSearch
-
the validity of his detention and who has been released on bail pending the habeas corpus proceeding. Sibray v. UnitedSearch
-
settled that, under such circumstances, a petitioner is not entitled to be discharged on habeas corpus. Respublica v. ArnoldSearch
-
State v. BuyckSearch
-
longer under actual restraint within the District of Columbia, he was not entitled to the writ of habeas corpus. Wales v. WhitneySearch
-
Esselborn, 8 F. 904. And likewise the question whether there was a right then to remove him. Compare Cheong Ah Moy v. UnitedSearch
-
be resolved not by the committing magistrate, but, after the removal, by the court which found the indictment. Beavers v. HenkelSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Stallings v. SplainSearch
-
Burton v. NewSearch
-
See Kurtz v. MuffittSearch
-
Stallings. Commonwealth v. PhelpsSearch
-
Commonwealth v. HallSearch
-
Nishimura Ekiu v. UnitedSearch
-
Sibray v. UnitedSearch
-
Respublica v. ArnoldSearch
-
Compare Cheong Ah Moy v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial