Citation network
Marshall Vs. New York
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 20, 1920
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Marshall v. NewSearch
-
York - 254 U.S. 380 (1920) U.S. Supreme Court Marshall v. NewSearch
-
York, 254 U.S. 380 (1920) Marshall v. NewSearch
-
priorities, or privileges existing or accruing under the state laws. P. 254 U. S. 385 . City of Richmond v. BirdSearch
-
was a prerogative right, not a mere rule of administration, and that it applied therefore in the federal courts. Sweet v. AllSearch
-
title to the debtor's property, absolutely or by way of lien, before the sovereign sought to enforce his right. Giles v. GroverSearch
-
Bing. 128, 139, 157, 183. In re Henley & Co., 9 Ch.D. 469. Compare United States v. PageSearch
-
in Page 254 U. S. 384 certain cases. Thus, while by the common law of England, The King (in aid of Braddock) v. WatsonSearch
-
provision, the annual franchise tax takes priority over incumbrances on the corporate property. New York Terminal Co. v. GausSearch
-
and had been ordered paid out of moneys in receivers' hands. Central Trust Co. v. NewSearch
-
state as to the existence of the right and its incidents will be accepted by this Court as conclusive. Compare Lewis v. MonsonSearch
-
St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co. v. WaterSearch
-
Archer v. GreenvilleSearch
-
enforceable against the property in the hands of a receiver appointed by a federal court within the state. Duryea v. AmericanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Conklin v. UnitedSearch
-
States Shipbuilding Co., 148 F. 129, 130. Compare Franklin Trust Co. v. NewSearch
-
Washington-Alaska Bank v. DexterSearch
-
paid out of the assets prior to other creditors does not, as pointed out in In re Tyler, supra (quoting Greeley v. ProvidentSearch
-
Mo. 458), arise from an express lien on the assets existing at the time they passed into the receiver's hands. State v. RowseSearch
-
Hamilton Page 254 U. S. 386 v. DavidSearch
-
Coy v. TitleSearch
-
F. 90. The right of priority has been likened to an equitable lien. State v. RowseSearch
-
by the civil law of Louisiana to certain classes of debts which it was assumed in Burdon Central Sugar Refining Co. v. PayneSearch
-
of any statute does not, of course, affect the right of enforcement in the federal courts. City of Richmond v. BirdSearch
-
Central Trust Co. v. NewSearch
-
People v. SuretySearch
-
Mixter v. MohawkSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Marshall v. NewSearch
-
Sweet v. AllSearch
-
Giles v. GroverSearch
-
Compare United States v. PageSearch
-
of Braddock) v. WatsonSearch
-
New York Terminal Co. v. GausSearch
-
Compare Lewis v. MonsonSearch
-
Duryea v. AmericanSearch
-
Compare Franklin Trust Co. v. NewSearch
-
Greeley v. ProvidentSearch
-
State v. RowseSearch
-
Burdon Central Sugar Refining Co. v. PayneSearch
-
Guffey v. SmithSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial