Citation network
Detroit United Ry. Vs. Detroit
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 13, 1919
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 429 (1919) U.S. Supreme Court Detroit United Ry. v. DetroitSearch
-
U.S. 429 (1919) Detroit United Railway v. DetroitSearch
-
a right to operate during the life of the ordinance, entitling the company to a fair return on its investment. Denver v. DenverSearch
-
entitle it to charge upon the former alone, impairs the obligation of the franchise contracts. Detroit United Railway v. MichiganSearch
-
non-franchise lines to remove its tracks from the streets of the city. This was settled in Detroit United Railway Co. v. DetroitSearch
-
or not. We cannot agree with this view. In our opinion, the case in this respect is ruled in principle by Denver v. DenverSearch
-
for a trip over it, the effect would be to impair the obligation of the franchise contract. Detroit United Railway v. MichiganSearch
-
Detroit United Railway v. DetroitSearch
-
feature injures him and operates to deprive him of rights protected by the federal Constitution. Plymouth Coal Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
a character that it has been often declared by this Court that it would exercise it only in clear cases. Fletcher v. PeckSearch
-
Fairbank v. UnitedSearch
-
which is not assailed, should be permitted to stand, under the rule of this Court applied from Bank of Hamilton v. DudleySearch
-
Pet. 492, 27 U. S. 526 , to St. Louis & Southwestern Ry. Co. v. ArkansasSearch
-
and, under the Denver case, it must therefore be interpreted as a grant (contrary, it would seem, to Blair v. ChicagoSearch
-
U. S. 446 may be required, within a reasonable time, to remove its pipes from the streets. Detroit United Railway v. DetroitSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Detroit United Ry. v. DetroitSearch
-
Denver v. DenverSearch
-
Detroit United Railway Co. v. DetroitSearch
-
Constitution. Plymouth Coal Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Bank of Hamilton v. DudleySearch
-
Detroit United Railway v. DetroitSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial