Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Barrett Vs. Virginian Ry. Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 09, 1919

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 5 linked 34 unlinked
Show
  1. Bowditch Vs. Boston US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1879
  2. Pleasants Vs. Fant US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1874
  3. District of Columbia Vs. Moulton US Supreme Court · May 27, 1901
  4. Nudd Vs. Burrows US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  5. Schuchardt Vs. Allens US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1863
  6. Barrett v. Virginian
    Search
  7. Ry. Co. - 250 U.S. 473 (1919) U.S. Supreme Court Barrett v. Virginian
    Search
  8. Ry. Co., 250 U.S. 473 (1919) Barrett v. Virginian
    Search
  9. Construing the statute in Nudd v. Burrows
    Search
  10. Indianapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Horst
    Search
  11. Oscanyan v. Arms
    Search
  12. Randall v. Baltimore
    Search
  13. Hepner v. United
    Search
  14. And this rule is not subject to modification by state statutes or Constitutions. Indianapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Horst
    Search
  15. St. Louis, Iron Mt. & Southern Ry. v. Vickers
    Search
  16. Derick v. Taylor
    Search
  17. Bac.Abr. Nonsuit (D). And see Pleasants v. Fant
    Search
  18. had the absolute right to take a Page 250 U. S. 477 voluntary nonsuit at any time before verdict. Harrison v. Clemens
    Search
  19. Citing Parks v. Ross
    Search
  20. How. 362, 52 U. S. 373 , and Richardson v. Boston
    Search
  21. How. 263 ( See also Schuchardt v. Allens
    Search
  22. latter is expressly prohibited. And the different nature and effect of the two things has been pointed out in Oscanyan v. Arms
    Search
  23. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's
    Search
  24. Palace Car Co., 139 U. S. 39 , and Slocum v. New
    Search
  25. York Life Insurance Co., 228 U. S. 364 , 228 U. S. 388 . The conclusion announced in Parks v. Southern
    Search
  26. conclusion accords with opinions by the Circuit Courts of Appeals for the Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits. Knight v. Illinois
    Search
  27. Meyer v. National
    Search
  28. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Metalstaff
    Search
  29. court with direction to set aside the judgment in favor of respondent and sustain motion to enter a nonsuit. Knight v. Illinois
    Search
  30. Harrison v. Clemens
    Search
  31. U.S. Supreme Court Barrett v. Virginian
    Search
  32. Indianapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Horst
    Search
  33. Constitutions. Indianapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Horst
    Search
  34. and Richardson v. Boston
    Search
  35. and Slocum v. New
    Search
  36. Parks v. Southern
    Search
  37. the Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits. Knight v. Illinois
    Search
  38. Knight v. Illinois
    Search
  39. Lincoln v. Power
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial