Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mullen Vs. Pickens

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 10, 1919

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 8 linked 19 unlinked
Show
  1. Doe Vs. Wilson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1859
  2. Jones Vs. Meehan US Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1899
  3. Crews Vs. Burcham US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1861
  4. Sizemore Vs. Brady US Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1914
  5. Monson Vs. Simonson US Supreme Court · Dec 01, 1913
  6. FranklIn Vs. Lynch US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1914
  7. Skelton Vs. Dill US Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1914
  8. Gritts Vs. Fisher US Supreme Court · May 13, 1912
  9. U.S. 590 (1919) U.S. Supreme Court Mullen v. Pickens
    Search
  10. U.S. 590 (1919) Mullen v. Pickens
    Search
  11. by estoppel or otherwise, to convey land selected and allotted after it was made. P. 250 U. S. 592 . Franklin v. Lynch
    Search
  12. U. S. 269 , followed. Mullen v. United
    Search
  13. in them, are entitled in equity to the lands subsequently allotted. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma held not. Mullen v. Pickens
    Search
  14. Mullen v. Gardner
    Search
  15. Page 250 U. S. 592 In Franklin v. Lynch
    Search
  16. obstacle in the way of the owner conveying his equitable interest after allotment, as was held by this Court in Mullen v. United
    Search
  17. U. S. 457 (and see like rulings, as to the corresponding provisions of the Creek Agreement, in Skelton v. Dill
    Search
  18. Graffenried, 238 U. S. 284 , 238 U. S. 319 ). But the decision in Franklin v. Lynch
    Search
  19. prior to selection operated to vest the title in the grantee as soon as the lands were selected and patented. Doe v. Wilson
    Search
  20. Black 352. Nor that a similar result was reached in Jones v. Meehan
    Search
  21. prior to allotment were to remain communal, without private interest that was capable of descent or alienation. Gritts v. Fisher
    Search
  22. but that any previous attempt to sell his expectancy is contrary to the spirit and policy of the act. Mullen v. United
    Search
  23. thereafter to be selected, either upon the ground of estoppel or because of any state statute having like force. Starr v. Long
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Mullen v. Pickens
    Search
  25. Mullen v. United
    Search
  26. In Franklin v. Lynch
    Search
  27. Starr v. Long
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial