Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Wagner Vs. Covington

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 08, 1919

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

38 entries 8 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Woodruff Vs. Parham US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1868
  2. Baccus Vs. Louisiana US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1914
  3. Rearick Vs. Pennsylvania US Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1906
  4. Dozier Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · May 31, 1910
  5. Browning Vs. Waycross US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1914
  6. Western Oil Refining Co. Vs. Lipscomb US Supreme Court · Jun 04, 1917
  7. Cheney Bros. Co. Vs. Massachusetts US Supreme Court · Mar 04, 1918
  8. Brennan Vs. Titusville US Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1894
  9. U.S. 95 (1919) U.S. Supreme Court Wagner v. Covington
    Search
  10. U.S. 95 (1919) Wagner v. Covington
    Search
  11. municipality. The Court of Appeals in the present case, in line with its previous decisions in City of Newport v. Wagner
    Search
  12. Ky. 641, 646, and City of Newport v. French
    Search
  13. merchant for resale do not constitute peddling within the meaning of the statutes of that state. Standard Oil Co. v. Commonwealth
    Search
  14. City of Newport v. French
    Search
  15. that in its actual effect violates no constitutional provision by inaccurately defining it. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. v. Arkansas
    Search
  16. Machine Co. v. Gage
    Search
  17. Ement v. Missouri
    Search
  18. U. S. 334 . The peddler's license tax considered in Welton v. Missouri
    Search
  19. products of other states, and therefore to an interference with commerce among the states. To the same effect, Walling v. Michigan
    Search
  20. sales of goods that are to be thereafter transported in interstate commerce has always been recognized. In Robbins v. Shelby
    Search
  21. be not taxed by reason of being brought from another state, but only taxed in the usual way as other goods are. Brown v. Houston
    Search
  22. Crenshaw v. Arkansas
    Search
  23. with or without the exhibition of samples, the goods sold to be thereafter transported from without the state. Rogers v. Arkansas
    Search
  24. Page 251 U. S. 104 Brennan v. Titusville
    Search
  25. Caldwell v. North
    Search
  26. U. S. 147 , 246 U. S. 153 . Judgment affirmed. No. 62. Gilligan v. City
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Wagner v. Covington
    Search
  28. City of Newport v. Wagner
    Search
  29. and City of Newport v. French
    Search
  30. Standard Oil Co. v. Commonwealth
    Search
  31. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. v. Arkansas
    Search
  32. Welton v. Missouri
    Search
  33. Walling v. Michigan
    Search
  34. In Robbins v. Shelby
    Search
  35. Brown v. Houston
    Search
  36. Crenshaw v. Arkansas
    Search
  37. Rogers v. Arkansas
    Search
  38. Gilligan v. City
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial