Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

illinois Central R. Co. Vs. State Pub. Util. Comm'n

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 14, 1918

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 6 linked 22 unlinked
Show
  1. Reeside Vs. Walker US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1850
  2. Cummings Vs. Chicago US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1903
  3. Savage Vs. Jones US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1912
  4. United States Vs. Mclemore US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1847
  5. American Express Co. Vs. Caldwell US Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1917
    Relied / Followed
  6. Reid Vs. Colorado US Supreme Court · Dec 01, 1902
  7. Illinois Central R. Co. v. State
    Search
  8. Pub. Util. Comm'n - 245 U.S. 493 (1918) U.S. Supreme Court Illinois Central R. Co. v. State
    Search
  9. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 245 U.S. 493 (1918) Illinois Central Railroad Company v. State
    Search
  10. Adams Express Co. v. Caldwell
    Search
  11. and, being suitable only by its consent, could not be sued in a district not within the consent given. See Finn v. United
    Search
  12. Schillinger v. United
    Search
  13. of the jurisdiction over the principal suit, even though, as an original bill it could not be entertained ( see Denver v. New
    Search
  14. original bills, or between ancillary suits and original suits, but extends to suits of every class. United States v. McLemore
    Search
  15. Hill v. United
    Search
  16. De Groot v. United
    Search
  17. Carr v. United
    Search
  18. Belknap v. Schild
    Search
  19. voidable. But that the premise is not sound is settled by the Shreveport Case (Houston, East & West Texas Ry. Co. v. United
    Search
  20. to the same level. Upon further consideration, that decision was approved and followed in American Express Co. v. Caldwell
    Search
  21. and not leave the territory or points to which it applies uncertain. Upon this point, we said in American Express Co. v. Caldwell
    Search
  22. of a state, even where that may be done, unless and except so far as its purpose to do so is clearly manifested. Reid v. Colorado
    Search
  23. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Harris
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Illinois Central R. Co. v. State
    Search
  25. Illinois Central Railroad Company v. State
    Search
  26. See Finn v. United
    Search
  27. Denver v. New
    Search
  28. the Shreveport Case (Houston, East & West Texas Ry. Co. v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales