Citation network
Southern Pacific Co. Vs. Lowe
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 03, 1918
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 330 (1918) U.S. Supreme Court Southern Pacific Co. v. LoweSearch
-
U.S. 330 (1918) Southern Pacific Co. v. LoweSearch
-
treated corporate earnings as not accruing to the shareholders until the time when a dividend was paid ( Lynch v. HornbySearch
-
Judicial Code, because of the constitutional question. That our jurisdiction was properly invoked is settled by Towne v. EisnerSearch
-
at the same time with several other cases arising under the same act and decided this day, viz., Lynch, Collector v. TurrishSearch
-
ante, 247 U. S. 221 , Lynch v. HornbySearch
-
post, 247 U. S. 339 , and Peabody v. EisnerSearch
-
according to population, received the approval of the requisite number of states only in February, 1913. Pollock v. Farmers'Search
-
Brushaber v. UnionSearch
-
We must reject in this case, as we have rejected in cases arising under the Corporation Excise Tax Act of 1909 ( Doyle v. MitchellSearch
-
Brothers Co., ante, 247 U. S. 179 , and Hays v. GauleySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
has no broader meaning in the 1913 act than in that of 1909 ( see Stratton's Independence v. HowbertSearch
-
from the Income Tax Act of June 30, 1864, c. 173, 13 Stat. 223, 281-282, under which this Court held, in Collector v. HubbardSearch
-
it took effect but paid out of a surplus that accrued to the corporation before that event, is set forth in Lynch v. HornbySearch
-
stockholder to dividends until the directors in their discretion declare them. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. NickalsSearch
-
U. S. 549 , 136 U. S. 558 . And see Humphreys v. McKissockSearch
-
of a controlling stockholder with his corporation has been Page 247 U. S. 339 raised. Pullman Car. Co. v. MissouriSearch
-
Peterson v. ChicagoSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Southern Pacific Co. v. LoweSearch
-
Lynch, Collector v. TurrishSearch
-
and Peabody v. EisnerSearch
-
Pollock v. Farmers'Search
-
Doyle v. MitchellSearch
-
and Hays v. GauleySearch
-
Stratton's Independence v. HowbertSearch
-
Collector v. HubbardSearch
-
New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. NickalsSearch
-
Pullman Car. Co. v. MissouriSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial