Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Hartranft Vs. Mullowny

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 03, 1918

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 5 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Degge Vs. Hitchcock US Supreme Court · May 26, 1913
  2. Harris Vs. Barber US Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1889
  3. Hyde Vs. Shine US Supreme Court · May 29, 1905
  4. Chott Vs. Ewing US Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1915
  5. Mclish Vs. Roff US Supreme Court · Dec 07, 1891
  6. U.S. 295 (1918) U.S. Supreme Court Hartranft v. Mullowny
    Search
  7. U.S. 295 (1918) Hartranft v. Mullowny
    Search
  8. police court, or the construction of a law of the United States, is in question will not give us jurisdiction. Chott v. Ewing
    Search
  9. McLish v. Roff
    Search
  10. of a subordinate tribunal when it has proceeded, or is proceeding, to judgment without lawful jurisdiction. Kennedy v. Gorman
    Search
  11. Bates v. District
    Search
  12. law jurisdiction and supervisory control over inferior tribunals, analogous to that of the King's Bench. United States v. West
    Search
  13. Bac.Abr. Tit. Certiorari (K), citing Rex v. Wakefield
    Search
  14. Rex v. Clace
    Search
  15. Rex v. Micklethwayte
    Search
  16. and the cause suggested should afterwards appear false, a procedendo should be awarded. See also Kennedy v. Gorman
    Search
  17. his personal, but in his official, capacity, as being in contemplation of law the custodian of the record ( see State v. Howell
    Search
  18. Kirkpatrick v. Commissioners
    Search
  19. Hutchinson v. Rowan
    Search
  20. a trial upon the merits in the police court would still be necessary. The bearing of this is manifest. Macfarland v. Brown
    Search
  21. this writ in order to obtain the judgment of the Supreme Court upon the validity of an indictment before trial. State v. Sailer
    Search
  22. State v. Powder
    Search
  23. State v. New
    Search
  24. State v. Nugent
    Search
  25. State v. Kelsey
    Search
  26. N.J.L. 641. Such being the practice, in Parks v. State
    Search
  27. To the same effect is State v. Kelsey
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Hartranft v. Mullowny
    Search
  29. Kennedy v. Gorman
    Search
  30. of the King's Bench. United States v. West
    Search
  31. Rex v. Wakefield
    Search
  32. State v. Howell
    Search
  33. Macfarland v. Brown
    Search
  34. State v. Sailer
    Search
  35. Parks v. State
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial