Citation network
Hammer Vs. Dagenhart
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 03, 1918
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 251 (1918) U.S. Supreme Court Hammer v. DagenhartSearch
-
U.S. 251 (1918) Hammer v. DagenhartSearch
-
which authorizes Congress to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the States. In Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
to prohibit is as to them but the exertion of the power to regulate. The first of these cases is Champion v. AmesSearch
-
commerce free from use in the transportation of tickets used in the promotion of lottery schemes. In Hipolite Egg Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
which prohibited the introduction into the States by means of interstate commerce of impure foods and drugs. In Hoke v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 247 U. S. 271 In Caminetti v. UnitedSearch
-
of women in interstate commerce for the purposes of debauchery and kindred purposes. In Clark Distilling Co. v. WesternSearch
-
shipped or used in interstate commerce make their production a part thereof. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R.R. Co. v. YurkonisSearch
-
Justice Jackson in In re Green, 52 Fed.Rep. 113.) This principle has been recognized often in this court. Coe v. ErrolSearch
-
framers of the Constitution when they vested in Congress the authority to regulate commerce among the States. Kidd v. PearsonSearch
-
said this court in United States v. DewittSearch
-
See Keller v. UnitedSearch
-
And in Dartmouth College v. WoodwardSearch
-
declared Chief Justice Marshall in McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
A statute must be judged by its natural and reasonable effect. Collins v. NewSearch
-
to them and to the people the powers not expressly delegated to the National Government are reserved. Lane County v. OregonSearch
-
authority is inherent, and has never been surrendered to the general government. Page 247 U. S. 276 New York v. MilnSearch
-
not beyond the regulative power of Congress merely because it prohibits certain transportation out and out. Champion v. AmesSearch
-
any inquiry into the purpose of an act which, apart from that purpose, was within the power of Congress. McCray v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 195 U. S. 27 . As to foreign commerce see Weber v. FreedSearch
-
Brolan v. UnitedSearch
-
to Congress, but the tax was sustained, and the objection, so far as noticed, was disposed of by citing McCray v. UnitedSearch
-
States. Flint v. StoneSearch
-
of the States over production was interfered with was urged again and again, but always in vain. Standard Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 221 U. S. 1 , 221 U. S. 68 , 221 U. S. 69 . United States v. AmericanSearch
-
Tobacco Co., 221 U. S. 1 06, 221 U. S. 184 . Hoke v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 321 , 227 U. S. 322 . See finally and especially Seven Cases of Eckman's Alterative v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 514 , 239 U. S. 515 . The Pure Food and Drug Act which was sustained in Hipolite Egg Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
others innocent in themselves, simply on the ground that the order for them was induced by a preliminary fraud. Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
adopted by Congress as convenient to the exercise of its power might have the character of police regulations. Hoke v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 227 U. S. 308 , 227 U. S. 323 . Caminetti v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 242 U. S. 470 , 242 U. S. 492 . In Clark Distilling Co. v. WesternSearch
-
Maryland R. Co., 242 U. S. 311 , 242 U. S. 328 , Leisy v. HardinSearch
-
generally prevails, I cannot believe that the fact would require a different decision from that reached in Champion v. AmesSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hammer v. DagenhartSearch
-
the States. In Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
Champion v. AmesSearch
-
In Hipolite Egg Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
In Hoke v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial