Citation network
Tempel Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 09, 1918
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Tempel v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 248 U.S. 121 (1918) U.S. Supreme Court Tempel v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 248 U.S. 121 (1918) Tempel v. UnitedSearch
-
by him against the United States was not within the jurisdiction of the district court under the Tucker Act. Hill v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 149 U. S. 53 , followed. United States v. LynahSearch
-
U. S. 445 , and United States v. CressSearch
-
for the United States, and the case comes here on writ of error. First. This is a suit, like United States v. LynahSearch
-
the state owns the lands under a navigable river. Riparian owners own the fee to the middle of the stream, St. Louis v. RutzSearch
-
make improvements therein for purposes of navigation, without the payment of compensation, West Chicago Street R. Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
United States v. Chandler-DunbarSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Willink v. UnitedSearch
-
in such permissible improvement is dredging for the purpose of deepening the channel. Lewis Blue Point Oyster Co. v. BriggsSearch
-
and a remedy for claims sounding in tort is expressly denied. Bigby v. UnitedSearch
-
Hijo v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 194 U. S. 315 , 194 U. S. 323 . As stated in United States v. LynahSearch
-
but the cause of action therefor, if any, is one sounding in tort, and for such the Tucker Act affords no remedy. Hill v. UnitedSearch
-
strong resemblance Page 248 U. S. 131 to the case at bar, is conclusive on this point. See also Schillinger v. UnitedSearch
-
United States has not conferred upon the district court jurisdiction to determine such a controversy. See Cramp & Sons v. CurtisSearch
-
character of the river and rights incidental thereto have been frequently considered by this Court. Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
Escanaba Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSearch
-
West Chicago Railroad v. ChicagoSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Tempel v. UnitedSearch
-
the Tucker Act. Hill v. UnitedSearch
-
and United States v. CressSearch
-
Bigby v. UnitedSearch
-
Hill v. UnitedSearch
-
Schillinger v. UnitedSearch
-
See Cramp & Sons v. CurtisSearch
-
Court. Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial