Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Crew Levick Co. Vs. Pennsylvania

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 10, 1917

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 4 linked 22 unlinked
Show
  1. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. Vs. Arkansas US Supreme Court · Apr 04, 1910
  2. Fargo Vs. Michigan US Supreme Court · Apr 04, 1887
  3. Mccall Vs. California US Supreme Court · May 19, 1890
  4. Baltic Mining Co. Vs. Massachusetts US Supreme Court · Nov 03, 1913
  5. U.S. 292 (1917) U.S. Supreme Court Crew Levick Co. v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  6. U.S. 292 (1917) Crew Levick Company v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  7. transacted, is both a regulation of foreign commerce and an impost or duty on exports, and is therefore void. Ficklen v. Shelby
    Search
  8. of the form it bears or how it is characterized by the state courts. Galveston, Harrisburg, & San Antonio Ry. Co. v. Texas
    Search
  9. Ry. v. Kansas
    Search
  10. resort is a fair index of its actual operation and effect upon commerce. Soon after the passage of the act, in Knisely v. Cotterel
    Search
  11. Robbins v. Shelby
    Search
  12. Philadelphia & Southern Steamship Co. v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  13. Leloup v. Port
    Search
  14. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Ry. Co. v. Texas
    Search
  15. commerce so far as the present question is concerned. The principal reliance of the Commonwealth is upon Ficklen v. Shelby
    Search
  16. thereto. For these and other reasons, the case has been deemed exceptional. In Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Adams
    Search
  17. is a direct burden upon it. So obvious is the distinction between this tax and those that were sustained in Maine v. Grand
    Search
  18. Trunk Ry. Co., 142 U. S. 217 , U.S. Express Co. v. Minnesota
    Search
  19. U. S. 335 , 223 U. S. 347 , Baltic Mining Co. v. Massachusetts
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court Crew Levick Co. v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  21. Crew Levick Company v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  22. Ficklen v. Shelby
    Search
  23. Knisely v. Cotterel
    Search
  24. In Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Adams
    Search
  25. Maine v. Grand
    Search
  26. U.S. Express Co. v. Minnesota
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales