Citation network
United States Vs. Archer
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 01, 1916
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 119 (1916) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ArcherSearch
-
U.S. 119 (1916) United States v. ArcherSearch
-
a dike in a navigable river is limited to compensation for the area actually occupied by the dike itself under Bedford v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 192 U. S. 217 , and Jackson v. UnitedSearch
-
upon it of waters of the river by reason of the construction and maintenance of the dike under United States v. GrizzardSearch
-
Citing United States v. GrizzardSearch
-
And they rely on United States v. GrizzardSearch
-
if so, the liability should be clear, the cause of it direct and certain. This we explained in Jackson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 230 U. S. 1 , and in Hughes v. UnitedSearch
-
No. 6, Original, Arkansas v. TennesseeSearch
-
of 1876, while in No. 10, Original, Arkansas v. MississippiSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The findings are conclusive upon this Court unless error of law appear in the record. United States v. SmithSearch
-
Stone v. UnitedSearch
-
construction and maintenance of the dike. The simple question is whether the case should be governed by United States v. GrizzardSearch
-
U. S. 180 , upon which the Court of Claims rested its decision, or by Bedford v. UnitedSearch
-
the taking as a trespass, but it does not dissentitle him to compensation for the land actually taken. New York v. PineSearch
-
and equity, from the mere act of taking, and it is upon the implied assumpsit that the action rests. United States v. LynahSearch
-
adjoining land owned by a third party. It is this doctrine that underlies the decisions of this Court in Bedford v. UnitedSearch
-
in substance that private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without compensation. Richards v. WashingtonSearch
-
on the other side of the line, and comes within a class of cases quite as well established, of which United States v. GrizzardSearch
-
can be found in the textbooks and cyclopedias. The doctrine has been uniformly adhered to by this Court. In Bauman v. RossSearch
-
In Sharp v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. GrizzardSearch
-
indirect injuries to the use of property adjacent but of which no part was taken from the owner. Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
Sharp v. UnitedSearch
-
Bedford v. UnitedSearch
-
land, and therefore no responsibility for the consequential damages arising from the government operations. Jackson v. UnitedSearch
-
and maintenance of the dike. I also think that the case comes clearly within the authority of United States v. GrizzardSearch
-
Tillson v. UnitedSearch
-
Harvey v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ArcherSearch
-
and Jackson v. UnitedSearch
-
Jackson v. UnitedSearch
-
Hughes v. UnitedSearch
-
Original, Arkansas v. TennesseeSearch
-
Original, Arkansas v. MississippiSearch
-
United States v. SmithSearch
-
New York v. PineSearch
-
Richards v. WashingtonSearch
-
Court. In Bauman v. RossSearch
-
of United States v. GrizzardSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial