Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Ex Parte United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 04, 1916

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

66 entries 66 unlinked
Show
  1. Fire Ins. Co. v. Wilson
    Search
  2. that those courts possessed the arbitrary discretion to permanently decline to enforce the law. The cases of Rex v. Hart
    Search
  3. How. State Trials 1344 and Regina v. Dunn
    Search
  4. the power, and then to those relied upon to establish it. In 1838, the Supreme Court of North Carolina, in State v. Bennett
    Search
  5. Page 242 U. S. 46 In 1860, in People v. Morrisette
    Search
  6. In People v. Brown
    Search
  7. or in arrest, or to enable the judge to better satisfy his own mind what the punishment ought to be, Commonwealth v. Dowdican's
    Search
  8. In 1874, in Commonwealth v. Dowdican's
    Search
  9. by courts in liquor cases. Page 242 U. S. 48 The case just cited was approvingly referred to in Sylvester v. State
    Search
  10. N.H.193, and declared to express the practice long prevailing in New Hampshire. In 1894, in People ex Rel. Forsyth v. Court
    Search
  11. of suspension was violated. In the cases cited in the margin the power was upheld upon the rulings in Commonwealth v. Dowdican's
    Search
  12. at the basis of the cases relied upon to the contrary. In the first place, on the face of the opinion in Commonwealth v. Dowdican's
    Search
  13. in the only case in which the subject was considered, it was expressly decided the power was wanting. United States v. Wilson
    Search
  14. F. 748 (1891). It is true that, in the District of Columbia, the existence of the power was maintained. Miller v. United
    Search
  15. right to continue to do so came to be recognized solely as the result of the prior practice. State ex Rel. Gehrmann v. Osborne
    Search
  16. People v. Kennedy
    Search
  17. Gray v. State
    Search
  18. People v. Blackburn
    Search
  19. State v. Voss
    Search
  20. Rel. Benton v. Court
    Search
  21. Rel. Smith v. Allen
    Search
  22. United States v. Folsom
    Search
  23. State v. Murphy
    Search
  24. Neal v. State
    Search
  25. Republic v. Pedro
    Search
  26. Miller v. Evans
    Search
  27. Rel. Boenert v. Barrett
    Search
  28. State v. Dalton
    Search
  29. Grundel v. People
    Search
  30. Tuttle v. Lang
    Search
  31. McCampbell v. State
    Search
  32. Tanner v. Wiggins
    Search
  33. State v. Hockett
    Search
  34. Wall v. Jones
    Search
  35. State v. Smith
    Search
  36. Rel. Cary v. Langum
    Search
  37. State v. Abbott
    Search
  38. Spencer v. State
    Search
  39. Rel. Dawson v. Sapp
    Search
  40. Daniel v. Persons
    Search
  41. State v. Sturgis
    Search
  42. State v. Talberth
    Search
  43. Fuller v. State
    Search
  44. Snodgrass v. State
    Search
  45. Roberts v. Wansley
    Search
  46. Hancock v. Rogers
    Search
  47. Brabandt v. Commonwealth
    Search
  48. Reese v. Olsen
    Search
  49. State v. Addy
    Search
  50. People v. Mueller
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial