Citation network
Brown Vs. Fletcher
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 05, 1915
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 589 (1915) U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. FletcherSearch
-
U.S. 589 (1915) Brown v. FletcherSearch
-
to recover property or an interest in property when the requisite value and diversity of citizenship existed. Barney v. BaltimoreSearch
-
one state to those of another, and thus render the maker liable to suit in the federal court. Bank of United States v. Planters'Search
-
Dundas v. BowlerSearch
-
the parties to the original agreement could not have there sued. While, therefore, it was admitted in Sere v. PitotSearch
-
and on claims other than those containing written promises to pay. That ruling, though criticized in Bushnell v. KennedySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Wall. 393, was constantly followed ( Sheldon v. SillSearch
-
Wall. 390-392. Neither did it apply to suit Page 235 U. S. 597 for damages for neglect of duty. Deshler v. DodgeSearch
-
construction authorized by previous decisions, they can only refer to a chose in action based on contract. Kolze v. HoadleySearch
-
his rights, by bill for specific performance, or by an action for damages for breach of the contract. Shoecraft v. BloxhamSearch
-
contract, or as a suit for the recovery of the contents of a chose in action, or as a suit on a chose in action. Upham v. DraperSearch
-
Herrick v. SnowSearch
-
Me. 310. See also Edwards v. BatesSearch
-
Nelson v. HowardSearch
-
benefit, though defeasible, was alienable to the same extent as though in his own possession and passed by deed. Ham v. VanSearch
-
Stringer v. YoungSearch
-
Lawrence v. BayardSearch
-
Woodward v. WoodwardSearch
-
The equity jurisdiction of such courts extends to suits by heirs against executors and administrators ( Security Co. v. BlackSearch
-
complainants' interest under the assignments executed by the cestui que trust was foreshadowed in Ingersoll v. CoramSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. FletcherSearch
-
Barney v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Bank of United States v. Planters'Search
-
Sere v. PitotSearch
-
Upham v. DraperSearch
-
Edwards v. BatesSearch
-
Ham v. VanSearch
-
Security Co. v. BlackSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial