Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Morgan Vs. Devine

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 01, 1915

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 1 linked 38 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Wiltberger US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1820
  2. U.S. 632 (1915) U.S. Supreme Court Morgan v. Devine
    Search
  3. U.S. 632 (1915) Morgan v. Devine
    Search
  4. separate acts have been committed with requisite criminal intent and such as are punishable by the statute. Burton v. United
    Search
  5. grow out of one transaction does not make a single offense where more than one are defined by the statute. Gavieres v. United
    Search
  6. MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the Court. This case was submitted at the same time with Ebeling v. Morgan
    Search
  7. of the sentence under the first count. The district court, believing the case to be controlled by the case of Munson v. McClaughry
    Search
  8. the subject of consideration in the federal courts, and the cases in those courts are in direct conflict. In Halligan v. Wayne
    Search
  9. F. 112, and Munson v. McClaughry
    Search
  10. release on habeas corpus. The rule has been held to be otherwise in Ex Parte Peters, 12 F. 461, and in Anderson v. Moyer
    Search
  11. The reason for the rule that but a single offense is committed and subject to punishment is stated in Munson v. McClaughry
    Search
  12. committed with the requisite criminal intent and are such as are made punishable by the act of Congress. In Burton v. United
    Search
  13. It is the legislature, not the court, which is to define a crime, and ordain its punishment.' United States v. Wiltberger
    Search
  14. Hackfeld & Co. v. United
    Search
  15. a single offense where two are defined by the statutes. Without repeating the discussion, we need but refer to Carter v. McClaughry
    Search
  16. Burton v. United
    Search
  17. States, 202 U. S. 344 , 202 U. S. 377 , and the recent case of Gavieres v. United
    Search
  18. Wilson v. State
    Search
  19. Dodd v. State
    Search
  20. Speers v. Commonwealth
    Search
  21. State v. Hackett
    Search
  22. Josslyn v. Commonwealth
    Search
  23. State v. Ingalls
    Search
  24. Gordon v. State
    Search
  25. Clark v. State
    Search
  26. State v. Hooker
    Search
  27. People v. Parrow
    Search
  28. State v. Martin
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court Morgan v. Devine
    Search
  30. Gavieres v. United
    Search
  31. Ebeling v. Morgan
    Search
  32. of Munson v. McClaughry
    Search
  33. In Halligan v. Wayne
    Search
  34. and Munson v. McClaughry
    Search
  35. Anderson v. Moyer
    Search
  36. Munson v. McClaughry
    Search
  37. of Congress. In Burton v. United
    Search
  38. Carter v. McClaughry
    Search
  39. of Gavieres v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial