Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Woodward Vs. De Graffenried

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 14, 1915

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

42 entries 5 linked 37 unlinked
Show
  1. Choate Vs. Trapp US Supreme Court · May 13, 1912
  2. Shellenbarger Vs. Fewell US Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1915
  3. Skelton Vs. Dill US Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1914
  4. Sizemore Vs. Brady US Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1914
  5. Reynolds Vs. Fewell US Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1915
  6. in the Original Creek Agreement did not apply to allotments made on behalf of deceased members of the tribe. Skelton v. Dill
    Search
  7. and distribution, and substituted the Arkansas law as expressed in Chapter 49 of Mansfield's Digest. Washington v. Miller
    Search
  8. of the Curtis Act, and then to consider the pertinent provisions of the Original Creek Agreement. In Barnett v. Way
    Search
  9. of property owned by any of its deceased members at the time of the member's death. To the same effect is Divine v. Harmon
    Search
  10. greatly from that of the others of the Five Civilized Tribes rehearsed in recent decisions of this Court. Mullen v. United
    Search
  11. Goat v. United
    Search
  12. Indian Territory, and legislation was framed with a special regard to its recommendations. ( See Holy Trinity Church v. United
    Search
  13. Binns v. United
    Search
  14. of the Indians. Some of the doubts were afterwards resolved by the decisions rendered by this Court in Stephens v. Cherokee
    Search
  15. Nation, 174 U. S. 445 , 174 U. S. 489 -491, and Cherokee Nation v. Hitchcock
    Search
  16. regulations issued to the Dawes Commission, excerpts from which are set forth in the marginal note infra. Goat v. United
    Search
  17. by Congress whether, without such consent, the tribal title could be devested in favor of an allottee. In Welty v. Reed
    Search
  18. had an inheritable estate or interest. This seems to have been based upon a mistaken view of what was decided in Goat v. United
    Search
  19. without number respecting questions of citizenship, and a mass of litigation arising out of them, as witness Stephens v. Cherokee
    Search
  20. true intent and meaning of an engagement made between the government of the United States and an Indian tribe. Jones v. Meehan
    Search
  21. upon her heirs according to Creek law. This accords with the view adopted by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Barnett v. Way
    Search
  22. Okl. 780, 785. And see Washington v. Miller
    Search
  23. by the provisions of the agreement. Such was the view expressed by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in De Graffenreid v. Iowa
    Search
  24. Land & Trust Co. (1907), 20 Okl. 687, 709-711. In Bartlett v. Okla
    Search
  25. effective August 8, 1902, 32 Stat. 2021), which substituted the Arkansas laws. See Ballinger v. United
    Search
  26. States, 216 U. S. 240 , 216 U. S. 249 . Sizemore v. Brady
    Search
  27. that an intermarried noncitizen husband could inherit under the tribal laws the same as if he were a citizen. Reynolds v. Fewell
    Search
  28. in the Original Agreement did not apply to allotments made on behalf of deceased members of the tribe. Skelton v. Dill
    Search
  29. of Mansfield's Digest. Washington v. Miller
    Search
  30. of the Original Creek Agreement. In Barnett v. Way
    Search
  31. Divine v. Harmon
    Search
  32. Court. Mullen v. United
    Search
  33. See Holy Trinity Church v. United
    Search
  34. Stephens v. Cherokee
    Search
  35. and Cherokee Nation v. Hitchcock
    Search
  36. In Welty v. Reed
    Search
  37. Jones v. Meehan
    Search
  38. Barnett v. Way
    Search
  39. Washington v. Miller
    Search
  40. De Graffenreid v. Iowa
    Search
  41. In Bartlett v. Okla
    Search
  42. See Ballinger v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial