Citation network
Pennsylvania R. Co. Vs. Clark Bros. Coal Mining Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 21, 1915
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Pennsylvania R. Co. v. ClarkSearch
-
Bros. Coal Mining Co. - 238 U.S. 456 (1915) U.S. Supreme Court Pennsylvania R. Co. v. ClarkSearch
-
Bros. Coal Mining Co., 238 U.S. 456 (1915) Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. ClarkSearch
-
the fact that the action in the state court is brought before the Commission has made the award. Penna. R. Co. v. PuritanSearch
-
Coal Co., 237 U. S. 121 , and Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. MulberrySearch
-
Hillsdale Coal & Coke Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Hillsdale Coal & Coke Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
preventing and redressing unjust discrimination by interstate carriers, whether in rates or facilities, apply. Rearick v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Sou. Pac. Terminal Co. v. InterSearch
-
Ohio R. Comm'n v. WorthingtonSearch
-
Texas & N.O. R. Co. v. SabineSearch
-
Louisiana R. Comm. v. TexasSearch
-
Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
R. Comm., 236 U. S. 157 , 236 U. S. 163 . Thus, in the case of Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. InterstateSearch
-
In Ohio Railroad Commission v. WorthingtonSearch
-
regulate interstate commerce, and the enforcement of the order of the State Commission was enjoined. Again, in Savage v. JonesSearch
-
the states is not a technical legal conception, but a practical one, drawn from the course of business.' Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
In Texas & N.O. R. Co. v. SabineSearch
-
Page 238 U. S. 469 discriminatory was one which the Commission had authority to pass upon. Inter. Com. Comm. v. IllSearch
-
Same v. ChicagoSearch
-
Morrisdale Coal Co. v. PennaSearch
-
Penna. R. Co. v. PuritanSearch
-
been inflicted thereby until the Commission had made its finding as to the reasonableness of the rule. Tex. & Pac. Ry. v. AbileneSearch
-
Balt. & O. R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Robinson v. BaltSearch
-
United States v. PacificSearch
-
Pennsylvania R. Co. v. PuritanSearch
-
violation of the act, and their ascertainment is within the scope of the Commission's authority. See Inter. Com. Comm. v. IllinoisSearch
-
Mitchell Coal Co. v. PennSearch
-
Morrisdale Coal Co. v. PennSearch
-
Pennsylvania Railroad v. PuritanSearch
-
a state or a federal court, but this is after the Commission's award has been made. In Pennsylvania Railroad v. PuritanSearch
-
was the exclusion of any other remedy in a state court. . . . In Mitchell Page 238 U. S. 471 Coal Co. v. PennaSearch
-
this, it is urged, Page 238 U. S. 472 was held in the Puritan case. See also Illinois Central R. Co. v. MulberrySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Pennsylvania R. Co. v. ClarkSearch
-
Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. ClarkSearch
-
and Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. MulberrySearch
-
Hillsdale Coal & Coke Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
of Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. InterstateSearch
-
Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Inter. Com. Comm. v. IllSearch
-
Tex. & Pac. Ry. v. AbileneSearch
-
See Inter. Com. Comm. v. IllinoisSearch
-
In Pennsylvania Railroad v. PuritanSearch
-
Coal Co. v. PennaSearch
-
Illinois Central R. Co. v. MulberrySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial