Citation network
Cramp Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 29, 1915
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Cramp v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 239 U.S. 221 (1915) U.S. Supreme Court Cramp v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 239 U.S. 221 (1915) William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the purpose of determining whether the claim, if established, is a valid one against the United States. United States v. MillikenSearch
-
As a conclusion of law, the court decided on the authority of United States v. CrampSearch
-
of the Court. The contract in this case and the release above set forth are in the form shown in United States v. CrampSearch
-
contract, although not arising from the actual construction of the vessel. In the subsequent case of Cramp and Sons v. UnitedSearch
-
make it the duty of this Court to independently Page 239 U. S. 229 consider the evidence are Harvey v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 105 U. S. 671 , and United States v. OldSearch
-
the ultimate facts established by the evidence, and not the evidence upon which the ultimate facts are based. Burr v. DesSearch
-
Moines R. Co., 1 Wall. 99, 68 U. S. 102 . In the case of District of Columbia v. BarnesSearch
-
Court would determine the questions of law properly brought to its attention upon such findings. In United States v. MillikenSearch
-
of March 3, 1887, had jurisdiction to reform the contract as a basis of a judgment for money damages. In United States v. SissetonSearch
-
judgment, this Court held that it would not go behind findings of fact made by the Court of Claims, citing McClure v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 116 U. S. 145 , and District of Columbia v. BarnesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
supra. In the first of these cases, McClure v. UnitedSearch
-
of the Court unless provision is made to the contrary in the special act. The court reviewed the case of Harvey v. UnitedSearch
-
the claim, if established, Page 239 U. S. 232 is a valid one against the United States. United States v. MillikenSearch
-
to recover. Nor do we find any room for the application in this case of the doctrine laid down in United States v. ClarkSearch
-
in any other form than as it was actually written. There was no mistake in the form of the instrument. United States v. MillikenSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cramp v. UnitedSearch
-
William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the United States. United States v. MillikenSearch
-
of United States v. CrampSearch
-
United States v. CrampSearch
-
of Cramp and Sons v. UnitedSearch
-
Harvey v. UnitedSearch
-
and United States v. OldSearch
-
Burr v. DesSearch
-
of District of Columbia v. BarnesSearch
-
In United States v. MillikenSearch
-
In United States v. SissetonSearch
-
McClure v. UnitedSearch
-
and District of Columbia v. BarnesSearch
-
of Harvey v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ClarkSearch
-
United States v. MillikenSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial