Citation network
United States Vs. Regan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 05, 1914
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 37 (1914) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ReganSearch
-
U.S. 37 (1914) United States v. ReganSearch
-
that our present duty, as we shall see, is chiefly that of applying settled rules of decision. In Stockwell v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. ZuckerSearch
-
In Hepner v. UnitedSearch
-
rule applicable in civil actions. Upon an extended review of the cases bearing upon the subject, including Atcheson v. EverittSearch
-
was imposed contemplated recovery only by a criminal proceeding, a civil remedy could not be adopted. United States v. ClaflinSearch
-
In Atcheson v. EverittSearch
-
Page 232 U. S. 45 In Wilson v. RastallSearch
-
In United States v. StevensonSearch
-
him, and no verdict against him can be directed, as might be the case in a civil action for the penalty. Hepner v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The latest case in this Court bearing upon the subject is Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
and in consequence not controlled by the prior decision in St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway. Co. v. TaylorSearch
-
was by the statute of 1907 denominated a misdemeanor, for the purpose in that, as was explained in United States v. StevensonSearch
-
or from the Sixth Amendment, for both relate to prosecutions which are strictly criminal in their nature ( Counselman v. HitchcockSearch
-
have generally applied in the administration of statutes authorizing a civil recovery of such penalties. United States v. BrownSearch
-
Boxes of Opium v. UnitedSearch
-
Hawlowetz v. KassSearch
-
United States v. SouthernSearch
-
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. IllinoisSearch
-
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
People v. BriggsSearch
-
State v. ChicagoSearch
-
Hitchcock v. MungerSearch
-
Sparta v. LewisSearch
-
O'Connell v. O'LearySearch
-
Munson v. AtwoodSearch
-
State v. KansasSearch
-
Deveaux v. ClemensSearch
-
Semon v. PeopleSearch
-
Walker v. StateSearch
-
Roberge v. BurnhamSearch
-
The cases upon which the defendant relies do not compel or lead to a different conclusion. While, in United States v. TheSearch
-
as this, the true measure of persuasion is that applied in criminal prosecutions, the Court was careful, in Lilienthal v. UnitedSearch
-
In Chaffee v. UnitedSearch
-
the case hardly can be regarded as settling the propriety of such an instruction, especially as, in Coffey v. UnitedSearch
-
of persuasion is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt, but the preponderating weight of the evidence. The cases of Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 116 U. S. 616 , and Lees v. UnitedSearch
-
than are the guaranties in article 3 and the Sixth Amendment governing trials in criminal prosecutions. Counselman v. HitchcockSearch
-
Hepner v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 213 U. S. 103 , 213 U. S. 112 . See also Callan v. WilsonSearch
-
Schick v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ReganSearch
-
In Stockwell v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial