Citation network
Barnes Vs. Alexander
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 12, 1914
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 117 (1914) U.S. Supreme Court Barnes v. AlexanderSearch
-
U.S. 117 (1914) Barnes v. AlexanderSearch
-
highest court of a territory that has since become a state upon a matter no longer subject to review here. Phoenix Ry. v. LandisSearch
-
as adopting whatever form, consistent with the facts, as is most fitted to reach the result seemingly desired. Sexton v. KesslerSearch
-
promise that gave them no specific claim against the fund. For this proposition, reliance is placed upon Trist v. ChildSearch
-
sufficient appropriation of the fund, so that the only remedy, if there had been one, would have been at law. Wright v. EllisonSearch
-
Wall. 69. This decision, so far as it concerns us here, seems to have overlooked Wylie v. CoxeSearch
-
that a contract for a contingent fee out of a fund awarded constituted a lien upon the fund. The remarks in Trist v. ChildSearch
-
of a territory that since has become a state, upon a matter no longer subject to review by us. See Phoenix Ry. Co. v. LandisSearch
-
as adopting whatever form consistent with the facts is most fitted to reach the result seemingly desired. Sexton v. PageSearch
-
of his own property, referring to the fund simply as the means that would enable him to do it. See National City Bank v. HotchkissSearch
-
of the common law that words of covenant may be construed as a grant when they concern a present right. Sharington v. StrottonSearch
-
Hogan v. BarrySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Ladd v. BostonSearch
-
even before it is acquired will make the contractor a trustee as soon as he gets a title to the thing. Mornington v. KeaneSearch
-
Holroyd v. MarshallSearch
-
been stated in words, and therefore creates a lien upon the Page 232 U. S. 122 principle not only of Wylie v. CoxeSearch
-
supra, but of Ingersoll v. CoramSearch
-
U. S. 335 , 211 U. S. 365 -368, which cites it and later cases. See further, to the same point, Burn v. CarvalhoSearch
-
Rodick v. GandellSearch
-
before the fund was received, as a covenant to set apart rents and profits creates a lien upon the land. Legard v. HodgesSearch
-
in intervention. Upon the point of pleading, we see no occasion to go behind the decision below. Phoenix Ry. Co. v. LandisSearch
-
London, Paris & American Bank v. AbramsSearch
-
St. Page 232 U. S. 123 Louis R. Co. v. WilsonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Barnes v. AlexanderSearch
-
Phoenix Ry. v. LandisSearch
-
Sexton v. KesslerSearch
-
Wright v. EllisonSearch
-
See Phoenix Ry. Co. v. LandisSearch
-
Sexton v. PageSearch
-
See National City Bank v. HotchkissSearch
-
Sharington v. StrottonSearch
-
Mornington v. KeaneSearch
-
of Wylie v. CoxeSearch
-
of Ingersoll v. CoramSearch
-
Burn v. CarvalhoSearch
-
Legard v. HodgesSearch
-
Louis R. Co. v. WilsonSearch
-
Christmas v. RussellSearch
-
Wylie v. CoxeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial