Citation network
Alabama Vs. Schmidt
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 26, 1914
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 168 (1914) U.S. Supreme Court Alabama v. SchmidtSearch
-
U.S. 168 (1914) Alabama v. SchmidtSearch
-
is honorary, and the power of the state where legal title has been vested in it is plenary and exclusive. Cooper v. RobertsSearch
-
to lands conveyed to the state absolutely by the United States although for the use of schools. Nor. Pac. Railway Co. v. TownsendSearch
-
enabling act. The state has the right to subject such lands in its hands to the ordinary incidents of title. Cooper v. RobertsSearch
-
of the state's legal control. The argument for the plaintiff in error relies mainly upon Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. TownsendSearch
-
has been met for some similar cases elsewhere by the Act of June 24, 1912, c. 181, 37 Stat. 138. Union Pacific R. Co. v. LaramieSearch
-
and it was held that the State of Michigan could sell its school lands without the consent of Congress. Cooper v. RobertsSearch
-
or involves a breach of trust, supposing that such positions are open to the state to take. American Emigrant Co. v. AdamsSearch
-
Spokane & British Columbia Ry. Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
Northern Ry. Co., 219 U. S. 166 . The gift to the state is absolute, although, no doubt, as said in Cooper v. RobertsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
But that Page 232 U. S. 174 obligation is honorary, like the one discussed in Conley v. BallingerSearch
-
of a fund, as in that case -- a course, we believe, that has not been uncommon among the states. See further Stuart v. EastonSearch
-
U. S. 383 , 170 U. S. 394 . Some reliance was placed upon Vincennes University v. IndianaSearch
-
been made to a private corporation, of which the rights could not be impaired by the state. The result of Cooper v. RobertsSearch
-
the ordinary incidents of other titles in the state, and that the judgment must be affirmed. Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. ElySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Alabama v. SchmidtSearch
-
Nor. Pac. Railway Co. v. TownsendSearch
-
Union Pacific R. Co. v. LaramieSearch
-
of Congress. Cooper v. RobertsSearch
-
American Emigrant Co. v. AdamsSearch
-
Vincennes University v. IndianaSearch
-
of Cooper v. RobertsSearch
-
Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. ElySearch
-
Stuart v. EastonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial